|
Posted Aug 5, '12 at 8:26am

HahiHa
4,227 posts
|
It is a big forest, and the people need to feed their families somehow, so why not go into the tree cutting business?
The natives are not the problem. The demand from first world countries is. If there was no demand for exotic woods, the rain forest wouldn't be destroyed at such a fast rate. The thing is that in many cases, lowering the demand on something would be effective; but even though people want to help, they don't realize that they have to be consequent in their lifestyle, and not just spend a bit of money and continue as if nothing happened.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 5, '12 at 3:47pm

Kevin4762
2,371 posts
|
Light strikes the leaves and is absorbed by chlorophyll, after a long, complex process the plant has used water, and co2, and made it into glucose and oxygen.
Did you listen to what i said, most of the light is blocked by the canopy, so it is pretty much like everything under it doesn't really get that much light and therefore doesn't put out much oxygen.
Not really. Your mixing photosynthesis and cellular respiration up. Not only do you not have a basic understanding of how plants work or how much oxygen rainforests produce, but your logic itself is fallacious.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 5, '12 at 3:48pm

Kevin4762
2,371 posts
|
Don't type anything that you wouldn't say in person.
What makes you think I wouldn't say it in person, or even be less vulgar in person?
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 5, '12 at 9:55pm

Krill11
99 posts
|
I wasn't just talking to you! Many others look at this thread, and no mater who sees it, it is usually pretty good advise.
Anyway,
Not really. Your mixing photosynthesis and cellular respiration up. Not only do you not have a basic understanding of how plants work or how much oxygen rainforests produce, but your logic itself is fallacious.
Thanks for being nicer-ish, still needs a little work, as just about everyone does, definitely including me, but it is getting there! Thank you very much!
~krill11
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 5, '12 at 11:31pm

Jacen96
1,198 posts
|
Not really. Your mixing photosynthesis and cellular respiration up.
Photosynthesis is where plants convert CO2 and H2O into C6H12O6 with the help of sunlight. Cellular respiration is where cells, both plant and animal, use C6H12O6 and oxygen to make CO2, H2O, and energy. However, because of the all the dead trees, and the fact that plants rely on cellular respiration when it is too hot for photosynthesis, a mature forest is carbon neutral.
source, and another one.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 8, '12 at 6:11pm

Krill11
99 posts
|
Umm, that Chemical equation (C6H12O6) doesn't seem to comply to the Octet rule, I might be wrong, but I cant seem to balance the equitation...
A little of topic, but if someone figure's it out, post it on here please.
...From what I figure it should be C6H12O18 for a balanced scale so it would be
6(CO2) + 6(H2O) = C6H12O18
Right? Where would the other Oxygen atoms have gone?
Really curious,
~krill11
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 8, '12 at 6:33pm

Jacen96
1,198 posts
|
Right? Where would the other Oxygen atoms have gone?
You are going to yell at me because i forgot one thing,
6(CO2)+6(H2O)+Sunlight=C6H12O6+6(O2) but plants also perform cellular respiration
C6H13O6+6(O2)=6(CO2)+6(H2O)+Energy
because of this, the animals in the forest, and the decaying tissue on the floor, a mature forest is carbon NEUTRAL.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 8, '12 at 9:36pm

Krill11
99 posts
|
Not yelling, just curious... I do not mean to offend.
~krill11
|
| |