Forums

ForumsWorld Events, Politics, Religion, Etc.

The Chillz Master and Right-Wing Politics

Posted Aug 2, '12 at 5:08pm

ChillzMaster

ChillzMaster

1,357 posts

Your Friendly Neighborhood Satanist wants to get something out of the way very quickly, he is very far on the right-wing spectrum of things. However, he absolutely abhors the Republican Party, which is the modern representative for the right-wing movement.

Allow me to elaborate; the two major parties present in the United States can be cut in half into two sets of policies, Social and Economical. The Democratic Party stands for equality for all, the ability that a man can be born without any restrictions on his well being... until he goes to cash his paycheck. He can marry another man, have as many kids as he wants, but there's always going to be a hole in his wallet from taxes to pay for excessive government spending on programs that carry those who cannot walk. (Medicare and Medicaid, blegh)

On the Republican side of things, we have Free-Market Capitalism at work. A rich man is a rich man because he was able to make smart decisions, or capitalize on the less-smart decisions on those around him. However, it is a sheltered existence. They aren't called "Conservatives" for nothing; the limiting of media and personal rights on a social level are absolutely atrocious, basing laws on "family morals" than actual progress for the good of the nation. Stem Cell research can save millions of suffering lives? But NOPE! It's "inhumane", it's "wrong" to abort and give those fetuses to research projects that would jump the human race ahead astronomically.

I've always been a greedy rule-breaker, I've always believed that the Big Bang happened because God willed it to, so naturally I take the good from both sides of the political parties.

Now we reach the point of my rant. A government that would allow unlimited economical freedoms with bare-minimum taxation while maintaining as little social restraints and prejudices as possible (allowance of gay marriage, removal of Hate Crimes) so to create "certain unalienable rights" for every human would create a progress-minded, do-it-yourself nation where every man can see eye-to-eye with another because they were born genetically equal, and can strive to meet as a better on the economical field.

TL DR:

-Gays should be able to marry
-The government should take as little money as possible
-The government should spend as little as possible
-The Internet is an open forum for all and not land a governing power can grab with his greasy claws
-The current "Second Trimester" Abortion situation is probably the best option for abortion
-Fox News needs to wake up and do some real Right-wing research

-Chillz the true right-wing nut

 

Posted Aug 2, '12 at 10:03pm

Freakenstein

Freakenstein

8,096 posts

Moderator

In a nation where the Green party is but a dream, Democrats would be the party most likely to regulate the number of children a family can have.

    there's always going to be a hole in his wallet from taxes to pay for excessive government spending on programs that carry those who cannot walk. (Medicare and Medicaid, blegh)

This is where a wider progressive tax makes everything tastier. Except in this nation, having a slightly higher tax for the wealthy would make everyone yell "THAT'S SOCIALISM" and be completely against it, even though this actually helps. Do you think Medicare and Medicaid are unsuccessful and money-wasting government programs? Do you believe every citizen of this nation has the ability to take care of their elderly relatives and have the cash to provide for their needs themselves?

    A rich man is a rich man because he was able to make smart decisions, or capitalize on the less-smart decisions on those around him.

Or inheriting.

    I've always been a greedy rule-breaker, I've always believed that the Big Bang happened because God willed it to, so naturally I take the good from both sides of the political parties.

This has nothing to do with political parties or politics at all. This is just Appealing to Stereotypes.

    removal of Hate Crimes

There should always be laws regarding social behavior like this. Removal of this regulation provides opportunity for exclusion, dismantling your dream of having people "see eye-to-eye". People aren't going to behave as easy as you're thinking. This is our nature.

    -The current "Second Trimester" Abortion situation is probably the best option for abortion

The best option is more likely the Germination and First Trimester stages. The Second Trimester stage of child development is where it will transition to the fetal stage, where the major organs and structure of the body has been created and is being reinforced. Aborting at this stage and beyond has the chance of harming the mother and can dishearten her and even advocates of Pro-Choice for choosing to abort this late. There are pills potential mothers can take where they can eliminate the growing mass of cells in the uterus during the germination period. Not only is this exceptionally safe and effective, but taking this method won't cost you an expensive trip to the specialist.

 

Posted Aug 2, '12 at 10:23pm

314d1

314d1

3,510 posts

Or inheriting.

Or just getting lucky. You know that lunch lady that worked for a small company named "Google"?

There should always be laws regarding social behavior like this. Removal of this regulation provides opportunity for exclusion, dismantling your dream of having people "see eye-to-eye". People aren't going to behave as easy as you're thinking. This is our nature.

...? You are saying that if I kill a guy because I wanted his money, I should get a shorter sentence then if I killed a guy because he was gay?...Why?

-The government should take as little money as possible

Possible to do what? Possible to build roads? Possible to make an army? Possible to pay for everyone's food another necessities?

-The Internet is an open forum for all and not land a governing power can grab with his greasy claws

So no law should effect the internet? Great! It is not like banks can be hacked this way.

-Fox News needs to wake up and do some real Right-wing research

Yes. Of course. Since YOUR way is the only right right wing. Everyone else? WRONG!.

 

Posted Aug 2, '12 at 10:48pm

Freakenstein

Freakenstein

8,096 posts

Moderator

    ...? You are saying that if I kill a guy because I wanted his money, I should get a shorter sentence then if I killed a guy because he was gay?...Why?

There's something wrong with your logic if that's the conclusion you surmised when you read that passage. Did my response have anything close with putting discrimination on a higher shelf than stealing? No.

Panzertank, if you're not going to be constructive to the discussion and instead comment about another's post, then don't post yourself.

 

Posted Aug 2, '12 at 11:13pm

314d1

314d1

3,510 posts

There's something wrong with your logic if that's the conclusion you surmised when you read that passage. Did my response have anything close with putting discrimination on a higher shelf than stealing? No.

Of course not. Your post had to do with putting "Hate crimes", which as we both know are violent crimes with racial motivations under U.S law, above other crimes. The "Stealing" thing is just an example. Or are you unclear on what a "hate crime" is?

 

Posted Aug 3, '12 at 12:26am

Kevin4762

Kevin4762

2,374 posts

This is where a wider progressive tax makes everything tastier.

Hahaha oh wow. Stealing from productive individuals is very tasty.

Or inheriting.

Even if they are rich by inheriting, in a free market, there is loss just as there is profit. We have the problem where it is too risky to start a business but too rewarding if an individual is running a business.

 

Posted Aug 3, '12 at 6:59am

EnterOrion

EnterOrion

3,615 posts

...? You are saying that if I kill a guy because I wanted his money, I should get a shorter sentence then if I killed a guy because he was gay?...Why?

Well, seeing as both will net you a capital murder charge, does it really matter?

Except in this nation, having a slightly higher tax for the wealthy would make everyone yell "THAT'S SOCIALISM" and be completely against it,

Because they like, don't already pay a significantly higher percentage than the rest of America, right? It's not like the top 1% pay 35% and the bottom 20% pay nothing at all, right?

Or inheriting.

Inheritance tax is already quite steep. Also, there is something extremely fundamentally wrong with such a tax. Is it not the behavior of mammals to attempt to care for their young, and among humans to provide a better future than they themselves had? It's effectively punishing them because their parents wanted them to have a better chance at life than they did.

 

Posted Aug 3, '12 at 8:43pm

Kevin4762

Kevin4762

2,374 posts

instead comment about another's post

lolwut. Isn't an important factor of debating commenting on another's views?

 
Reply to The Chillz Master and Right-Wing Politics

You must be logged in to post a reply!