yes the stats did help, and there wasn't just more older spammers because there are more older, if you reviewed 10 under aged and 10 over aged there would be more over aged.
I do go on newgrounds alot, i watch a few 18yr things (Nothing bad) but mostly 13+ things.
It doesn't really matter what users think the age should be, it is an actual law that users under 13 years cannot interact with this site. Check out the Terms and Conditions, second paragraph: Terms and Conditions
I think it wouldnt matter as long as the are sensable you could atleast put them through a test or make there parents agree to let them play thrpugh the parents email address!
Anyone below 13 should not be allowed on this site. They are usually very rude, and don't respect many rules.
are you serious?!!? the only problem we have is spelling.
anyway, its a law for most websites. also my mom caught my brother in the forums and got angry. I still think parental consent forms would be a good idea. the content of AG is good, except for punk-o-matic (click on 'dude' and you'll see what i mean)
This Site is offered and made available only to users thirteen (13) years of age or older. If you are not yet 13 years old or the required greater age for certain features, please discontinue using the Site immediately,
and if it's a law then all of you people under 13 on this site are breaking the laww >
Well even though people aren't supposed to get an account if they are under 13, I don't see the big deal in it. They just want to have fun too. However, as Carlie said, it is a law and they cannot get a account legally.