Please elaborate.

Just go back a couple pages. The universe is flat or at least close to flat. This means we are most likely to experience heat death where the universe just keeps expanding instead of a Big Crunch.

I think it has always been. The big bang theory seems pretty accurate, but until we learn more (perhaps the next century will bring a new theory), it's all up to interpretation. I believe that it is infinite, both in size and time.

6-8000 years old.  God made it that long ago.  Scientists try to take God out of our lives by making up ridiculous time periods that they have no way of proving AT ALL!  At least I have written proof.

At least I have written proof.

You have concrete written 'proof' of a rough estimate with a variance of ~30%?

As a catholic, I believe the bible

Then why the 2000 year gap?

I forget if there's 6000 or 4000 years in the old testament.  Remember, im only 15.

I forget if there's 6000 or 4000 years in the old testament. 

The most common Creationist date is 6000 years old for the age of the earth, give or take a few hundred years.

Remember, im only 15.

Age is no excuse. You're making definite claims and those claims are open to scrutiny. Saying that you're only 15 hurts your case, as you're implying that you may be wrong because you're inexperienced/young.

Scientists try to take God out of our lives by making up ridiculous time periods that they have no way of proving AT ALL!

They aren't trying to, "take God out of our lives," at all. Many scientists hold religious beliefs. Unlike religion, science isn't pulling these dates out of its rear end. We have every reason to accept dating methods, logic and empirical evidence over a old book which no three people can agree on in every spot. 

As a catholic, I believe the bible

Even if that's so, every heard of metaphors? Ever considered that it was written by man, not God? Ever realize that some of the things in there are obviously not true or possible (Noah's Ark, especially)? Even if you want to believe that there's a God and that he sent his son down in a, ahem, loving act of murder, that's no reason to take the bible as the literal truth. We have more evidence to the contrary that you will probably ever read in your lifetime and thousands of the smartest people in the world spend their lives arguing with each other and proving their points.

Whereas we have 2000 year old book which says rabbits eat their own cud and that thousands of animals could fit and live on a wooden boat for 40 days and nights, when it's smaller than the Titanic was.

Don't you dare deny the bible you blasphemous pig.  Get ur atheist as to hell.

If you're incapable of respectable discussion, I'll request that you refrain from posting about these topics.

The bible is one of many religious scriptures. I have no reason to take it any more seriously than I do the Torah, Koran, Vedas, Native American legends, Greek epics, or the Egyptian book of the dead.

Your personal scripture is not valid evidence in of itself. The claims it makes are subject to scrutiny as everything else is.

Btw, nothing i say that's not in the bible, im stating as a theory.

The double negative is a little confusing. There's also this I'd like to address.

A scientific theory is different from a theory any random person makes up. When you see a squirell squashed in the road and take a guess that a semi ran it over because of how uniformly flat it is, that's a theory.

A scientific theory is an in depth description of natural processes which have been verified by the scientific community and are supported by vast amounts of empirical evidence. There is not higher level of classification than a Theory when it comes to concepts.

Theories will never be a Law, not because it cannot be proven or is inaccurate, but because that is not how scientific nomenclature works. A law is a single concept which functions the same universally. Each are the top of their respective areas.

KnightDeclan. Read the following link. If you don't understand what they're talking about, then you have no right to claim to know that we have no evidence for the age of the universe. We do have means to calculate it, and even if our models certainly will adapt with time, we still have a quite well defined educated guess, based on actual observation. That's more than an old scripture full of myths can ever hope to achieve.

How Old is the Universe?