|
Posted Nov 12, '12 at 9:58am

HahiHa
4,232 posts
|
I'm gonna take a wild shot at 50 billion years. Just because 17 billion doesn't feel big enough.
Even 1 billion is more time than a human could ever comprehend, what good does it do to throw subjective numbers out in the wild if we have an estimate backed up by evidence?
|
| |
|
Posted Nov 12, '12 at 5:59pm

MageGrayWolf
9,136 posts
|
Even 1 billion is more time than a human could ever comprehend, what good does it do to throw subjective numbers out in the wild if we have an estimate backed up by evidence?
Let's try to put it in terms people can relate to.
Let's say we could take each year and store it on a computer. Each year took up 1 megabyte of space. That would mean we would need a computer that had a 13.75 petabyte hard drive, or 13,750 terabyte hard drive.
|
| |
|
Posted Nov 13, '12 at 10:43pm

SwordmasterQ
23 posts
|
The universe is as old as time itself.
|
| |
|
Posted Nov 14, '12 at 1:32am

MageGrayWolf
9,136 posts
|
The universe is as old as time itself.
Using time in such a general sense this might not be the case. For instance if we have multiple universes, time could exist in those other universes "before" this universe existed. Though time in the sense that we know it, this would be the case.
|
| |
|
Posted Dec 16, '12 at 6:48pm

ptcdcs
12 posts
|
Scientific Analysis ranges between 13.75 Billion Years - 7 Trillion. So it is undefined but very old.
|
| |
|
Posted Dec 16, '12 at 11:21pm

MageGrayWolf
9,136 posts
|
Scientific Analysis ranges between 13.75 Billion Years - 7 Trillion. So it is undefined but very old.
Do you have a source for this?
|
| |
|
Posted Dec 17, '12 at 2:56pm

HahiHa
4,232 posts
|
13.75 Billion Years - 7 Trillion
That sounds random. Why, when giving a time range, making the minimum so exact compared to the max? Doesn't make any sense and gives me the suspicion you made up the 7 trillion.
|
| |
|
Posted Dec 17, '12 at 3:45pm

wontgetmycatnip
95 posts
|
That sounds random. Why, when giving a time range, making the minimum so exact compared to the max? Doesn't make any sense and gives me the suspicion you made up the 7 trillion.
There are a variety of ways to measure the age of the earth; as science marches on, we will find more and more precise ways to measure the age of the earth.
|
| |
|
Posted Dec 17, '12 at 4:22pm

HahiHa
4,232 posts
|
What I was trying to say is, 13.75 billion - 7 trillion years is (if I get the American system right) a time interval of 6.98625 trillion. 0.01375 trillion more or less doesn't seem worth notifying in any serious proposition then.
|
| |
|
Posted Dec 17, '12 at 6:49pm

partydevil
4,402 posts
|
|
| |