Note 1: You cannot use BBCode in the comments (That means no bold or italics), and there will not be spaces between paragraphs. The formatting most of you are choosing may look terrible in the comments. Please test them out in your own comments and click view all comments to see if you are satisfied with the way it looks.
REPLIES:
@70_70_70 It doesn't matter what game you pick. I'm not keeping track of what games you guys are picking. If I can't tell from your review, it's not going to be a good review.
@GhostOfHorror You can take as long as you'd like.
@xerox Your grammar might be an issue. You should have someone proofread for you.
@zonic98 Anyone can do this, but if you already have a merit from a game comment, you cannot earn the guaranteed merit. If it's not a merit from a game comment, you need to submit proof.
@keguamongo Sure thing.
REVIEWS:
@Patrick2011 Why do you like the graphics (L1) and menu (L3)? Rate of difficulty increase (L1-2) and goal reached message (L2) are specific. Graphics and menu are not. If you can't say why or if it can't be inferred, it's best to leave it out because it doesn't add value. The following sounds like a fluff sentence: "The screen is not too big, and lag is not an issue with this game." I'm not sure what it adds. You can probably leave out the goal reached message unless you really really like it. A game about reaching a goal and not telling you you reached the goal would be bad, but if it did tell you, then that's just par for the course. You're also contradicting yourself. This is a problem with a lot of reviews that look good on the surface but do not read as well. You like the rate of difficult increase (L1-2) but late game is too difficult (L7)? That's how it's reading.
@ImTheMostManlyMan I am not at all following your logic behind the paragraph breaks. It just makes it harder to read.
@VonHeisenbourg You have to take into account that Light People on Fire is an older game and that there is a sequel. Achievements weren't a "thing" back then for flash games. Armorbotz was replaced some time later with the current Armor Game high score board.
@xerox It's not bad. There are grammar and punctuation problems, but it's still understandable. You're using too many ellipses, extra periods, and commas. Capitalize the first word beginning a sentence. Capitalize "I". Put a space between punctuation and the next word. Put a space between a word and opening parentheses. Uncapitalize Guns (L3). Remove the comma after "is" (Storyline L2). Remove the comma after "sword" (Storyline L3). Use "weakest" instead of "most weak" (Storyline L3). The "Storyline" section could just be one paragraph. Remove the comma after "out" (Bugs L1) "It's" stands for "it is". Its is possessive like his or her (Bugs L3). Your rating is really arbitrary and doesn't add anything to the review.
@royalguy List format isn't going to work out. Lists are almost always a crutch in place of something more cohesive. Pro 1 and Con 5 talk about the same thing. Pro 3 and Con 6 talk about multiplayer. There's also discussion on campaign and computer modes. You can combine related pros and cons into better cohesive paragraphs.
ROSTER:
70_70_70
EmperorPalpatine
fantasy4life*
GhostOfHorror
ImTheMostManlyMan
Jacen96
kegaumongo
Patrick2011
R2D21999
royalguy
Runescape124
trying
VonHeisenbourg
vinster132
xeano321
xerox
xXxDAPRO89xXx
*Ineligible for SIPPYCUpS merit guarantee.
Please let me know if I've missed anyone. This is and will be a big thread.
