I don't think animals will adhere to your command just after one round of scolding or time out. And really, time out?
It worked with my dogs.. If they did anything bad I would immediately put them in their kennel.
One dog had a whole backyard, which by the way was pretty big, and when we locked him up in a cage he would start whining and barking and this is because he has sort of a sense of ''freedom''. The other dog had the freedom to go anywhere and even be out without a leash, so when put into a cage she wasn't very happy and she would whine and bark as well and we'd just ignore her. Eventually we would let them out after a while and they usually never did ''that thing'' they did earlier. We also did this with ''potty'' training as well and it worked like a charm. But again, every dog is different so you can't be sure and sometimes different measures of discipline have to be taken into account.
I have ''spanked'' my dogs a few times, but it wasn't anything exaggerated, they would just sit and stay where they were, I would then pull them into the cage and close it. Sometimes my bigger dog would know, and he would just walk tot he cage himself and sit there until I locked it and then he would lie down.
I don't think spanking is a great method but it can work, just as long as it's your last resort of discipline it should be fine.
From personal experiences I can truthfully say that it is a major amount of pain!
Spanking never hurt me. The belt did though lol. Though I wasn't punished very often, and usually if I was I just got grounded.
Not that that means we shouldn't do it. Being necessary doesn't make it right, though.
This. That about covers most of the hunting..
OT:
Animal cruelty in itself is wrong.
Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse or animal neglect, is the infliction of suffering or harm upon non-human animals, for purposes other than self-defense.
So even hunting is a form of cruelty, but it's a necessity. To eat you need to hunt and to hunt you must commit the act of animal cruelty. Then again it could be said that the animal dies instantly so it isn't abuse or cruelty, but I think otherwise.
That definition which I got from wiki, I also consider my definition, because, to be honest, it is a form of animal cruelty if it's not self-defense. What it comes down to is what you consider self-defense to be.
Superiority: Teasing a dog with a treat, then giving it to him is not cruel. Teasing a starving dog with a treat, then ignoring him is.
Anger: Smacking a dog with a newspaper to train him is not cruel. Smacking a dog with a baseball bat to let off some steam is.
Entertainment: Putting a silly hat on your dog and laughing is not cruel. Setting your dog on fire and laughing is.
I agree with this as well. Me having 2 dogs over a span of 8-10 years I can say that it's pretty much that.
I would put that somewhere between the "cruel" category and the "not cruel" catagory, aka the "just being a jerk" category.
To be honest, not really. This is just stating that you are the dominant one and not the dog. It should be like this. You lead.. not the dog.