|
Posted Feb 3, '13 at 8:33pm
thugtastic
136 posts
|
What is your opinion on the best form of government?
Most of us live in a democratic society, but there are many who are of the mind of Monarchy, Communism, or otherwise..
What do you think?
|
|
|
Posted Feb 3, '13 at 9:16pm
bigjacob
384 posts
|
Anarchy. Heh. Just kidding. For real..A Monarchy, even though I don't live in one. But a Monarchy with limited powers.
|
| |
|
Posted Feb 3, '13 at 9:34pm
greenpeople2007
119 posts
|
Problem with a monarchy is you can end up with a non-leading type for a head-of-state.
The best is probably a mix of socialism, communism and democracy, you could vote for a leader, all taxes could be spent on the people, and there would be little governmental deficit, at least if it was a perfect world.
|
| |
|
Posted Feb 3, '13 at 9:53pm
Squidbears
634 posts
|
Idealistically, Anarchy would be the best. In a perfect world we would not need protection, or a leader.
|
| |
|
Posted Feb 3, '13 at 9:54pm
thugtastic
136 posts
|
Perfect Communism is near-ideal but it never works out.
I prefer Monarchy.
bugjacob do you mean Constitutional Monarchy?
|
| |
|
Posted Feb 4, '13 at 12:48am
pangtongshu
4,465 posts
|
One that works
/deep
But in all seriousness..a democratic-republic with fascist ideals. Yeah..tis sounds nice
|
| |
|
Posted Feb 4, '13 at 1:06am
Masterforger
1,625 posts
|
If it's a small country that is rather wealthy, a government that pays for itself. Governments are nearly always formed of rich people, so why not make the government empty its own pockets for the people?
|
| |
|
Posted Feb 4, '13 at 1:43am
Squidbears
634 posts
|
with fascist ideals
Just remember a quote from Albert Einstein:
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind.
and Dan Fried:
Nationalism ... is like cheap alcohol. First it makes you drunk, then it makes you blind, then it kills you.
|
| |
|
Posted Feb 4, '13 at 1:59am
pangtongshu
4,465 posts
|
Just remember a quote from Albert Einstein:
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind.
and Dan Fried:
Nationalism ... is like cheap alcohol. First it makes you drunk, then it makes you blind, then it kills you.
Perfect! We are getting a bit overpopulated on this here planet
|
| |
|
Posted Feb 4, '13 at 1:59am
wolf1991
3,054 posts
|
Personally my political views, simply based around my current society support a socialist democracy. However, had I the oppourtunity, I would support a meritocracy; if only because I have come toe realize most people do not care about politics and they should. A meritocracy would limit the masses and ensure that only the well informed and intelligent made the crucial descions that are needed to be made.
|
| |
|
Posted Feb 4, '13 at 12:41pm
partydevil
4,405 posts
|
i like the limited power monarchy. it has to be a democracy, 1 guy giving ultimate power over the country. that might not even suits him own needs is just bad. as for left or right winging. i'm in the middle. i have ideals going both ways but progressive anyway.
Idealistically, Anarchy would be the best. In a perfect world we would not need protection, or a leader.
Anarchy is not perfect. Anarchy is chaos.
Governments are nearly always formed of rich people, so why not make the government empty its own pockets for the people?
politicians have a job whit lots or responsibility. whit lots of working hours and be able to shift fast from topic while keeping track of them.
people that do this work should be rewarded greatly for it. if we do not do that. then why would they be in the politics? the business world has loads of opportunities for people whit such capabilities. and they will keep rewarding them what they earn.
|
| |
