It doesnt matter whether Einstein said that at all. What matters is the point that boy made.
The point the boy made, that some things are defined by the absence of another, is not relevant to the topic. Nor does it prove God in any way, shape, or form.
I'm on the winning side here.
If you're referring to the debate, shoving off burden of proof and bringing irrelevant matters into your own topic is not winning.
If you mean the afterlife, you have nothing to base that on.
Christians win either way, whether theres a God or whether some man named Darwin is right... sooooo yeah.
Unless Buddhism is right. Or Hinduism. Or Wicca. Or Satanism. Or Islam. Or it's really Zeus. Or it's actually the various Native American religions. Or it's Voodoo. I could go on like this for a while.
We've already gone over how Pascal's Wager is false. Believing in one religion just because is no 'safer' than not believing. There are tens of thousands of different religions even if you want to count one of those as being right. It could be that none of them are and you're 100% screwed regardless. Or, we could drop the insanity, and just look at how much more sense it would make for there to not be a god.