|
Posted Mar 15, '13 at 6:59am
roydotor2000
78 posts
|
World War I and II are futile to the might-be incoming war, the third World War.
You might laugh this time, but it will happen. Due to the recent events of the 21st century, it will happen. Some of the events are: 9/11, Sabah crisis, and N.K.'s declaration of war. So be prepared. I think it would be a nuclear war. But cyber warfare is more likely than the former.
"Wars will subside, but war can't be prevented" ---------- Anonymous
|
|
|
Posted Mar 16, '13 at 5:46pm
rocky10199
40 posts
|
You might laugh this time
I will.
I think it would be a nuclear war
Just try and picture that... That is not really war, more like genocide. The repercussions of a nuclear war are far too great, no country wants that, they're all too scared of that. So (in my opinion) your theory of a nuclear war sounds pretty far fetched to me, just with this simple explanation.
|
| |
|
Posted Mar 16, '13 at 8:20pm
pangtongshu
4,465 posts
|
So (in my opinion) your theory of a nuclear war sounds pretty far fetched to me, just with this simple explanation.
Not really that far-fetched..actually.
A nuclear weapon doesn't necessarily mean complete decimation..nor does it require a large "punch". With strategic weapon designs and attack placement..a war can be made from nuclear weaponry
|
| |
|
Posted Mar 16, '13 at 10:06pm
EmperorPalpatine
4,124 posts
|
A nuclear weapon doesn't necessarily mean complete decimation
They've had low-yield suitcase nukes that fit in a launcher the size of a large rucksack for about 50 years. I'd bet they've got much smaller, more transportable, more concealable ones now.
From Wiki:
In 1994 the United States Congress passed The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994, preventing the government from developing nuclear weapons with a yield of less than 5 kilotons, thereby making the official development of these weapons in the U.S. unlikely. This law was, however, repealed in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004.
|
| |
|
Posted Mar 16, '13 at 10:31pm
blk2860
3,000 posts
|
So it'll be Syria for a change? Not Germany? Odd.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
-Albert Einstein
|
| |
|
Posted Mar 16, '13 at 10:35pm
kingofwar1234
447 posts
|
So it'll be Syria for a change
I highly doubt that Syria has nearly enough money to focus on making nuclear weaponry at the moment...
|
| |
|
Posted Mar 16, '13 at 10:59pm
blk2860
3,000 posts
|
I highly doubt that Syria has nearly enough money to focus on making nuclear weaponry at the moment...
In one of those countries there's talk of nuclear weapons.
|
| |
|
Posted Mar 17, '13 at 5:07am
Masterforger
1,625 posts
|
In one of those countries there's talk of nuclear weapons.
There's always talk of nuclear weapons, but let's not try to pin a tail on a nonexistent donkey.
There may be a WWIII, there may not be. Depends on how you defined WW3. A certain number of countries? Has to contain the superpowers? Requires Germany? Needs to effect all countries?
|
| |
|
Posted Mar 17, '13 at 5:23am
HahiHa
4,234 posts
|
I agree with the OP though, cyber warfare is more likely and actually already happens to some extent.
Not Germany? Odd.
Requires Germany?
Why do y'all keep mentioning Germany? Just because it was involved in the last WW?
|
| |
|
Posted Mar 17, '13 at 8:13am
partydevil
4,405 posts
|
Needs to effect all countries?
atleast some countries from 4 of the 6 continent (excluding antarctica)
Requires Germany?
no
Has to contain the superpowers?
no (but they will stick there nose in a ww3 anyway)
|
| |
|
Posted Mar 17, '13 at 9:13am
blk2860
3,000 posts
|
Why do y'all keep mentioning Germany? Just because it was involved in the last WW?
Because. They started WWI and WWII, so them not starting WWIII is odd.
|
| |
