Forums

ForumsWorld Events, Politics, Religion, Etc.

Marriage equality

Posted May 24, '13 at 8:22am

HahiHa

HahiHa

5,258 posts

Knight

But Gay/***got/Lesbian pairs SHOULD NOT HAVE KIDS

There is absolutely no evidence for a difference between children brought up by heterosexuals and by homosexuals, except that the latter are more tolerant (d'uh).
I would say if anything, children brought up by a single parent are the loosers. This should be discussed first.
 

Posted May 24, '13 at 8:24am

Bladerunner679

Bladerunner679

2,534 posts

But Gay/***got/Lesbian pairs SHOULD NOT HAVE KIDS


they can't anyway, but your bigoted opinions shouldn't stop them from adopting kids. I'm perfectly fine with it should they want to be a parent.

-Blade
 

Posted May 24, '13 at 8:33am

partydevil

partydevil

5,119 posts

I would say if anything, children brought up by a single parent are the loosers.

i hope you mend a different definition of a loser then i thought at the 1st time reading. xD

anyway. the only bad thing i can see that can happen is that the child gets bullied for having homosexual parents. but neither the parents or the child do something wrong there. the other kids find it weird because they are not used to it in their family and simply dont know better.
 

Posted May 24, '13 at 8:51am

HahiHa

HahiHa

5,258 posts

Knight

i hope you mend a different definition of a loser then i thought at the 1st time reading. xD

I don't know what you thought of... and I'm not sure I want to know :P
My point was, having two aprents is always better for the childs development than having only one.

but neither the parents or the child do something wrong there. the other kids find it weird because they are not used to it in their family and simply dont know better.

In some way, wouldn't that mean that having more children in your class raised by homosexual couples might help acceptance through early confrontation? Over long time, of course; they'd still get bullied in the beginning no matter what I guess.
 

Posted May 24, '13 at 9:22am

partydevil

partydevil

5,119 posts

In some way, wouldn't that mean that having more children in your class raised by homosexual couples might help acceptance through early confrontation? Over long time, of course; they'd still get bullied in the beginning no matter what I guess.

in the netherlands they can for about more then a decade now. and no, no big changes really. locally, yes eventually when a theacher talks about it whit the kids and educate them on sexuality. but it's not a must for theachers to do so. so it will 99% of the time happen after it is already done.

if it was universally excepted it would be different of course. then the mass media on the subject would also follow a different path. (a better path.)
 

Posted May 24, '13 at 3:17pm

EmperorPalpatine

EmperorPalpatine

9,436 posts

OF COURSE THEY WILL BE ADOPTED

Gay =/= infertile. They could use a surrogate or artificial means if they wanted to.
 

Posted May 24, '13 at 3:31pm

MageGrayWolf

MageGrayWolf

9,776 posts

Knight

Gay =/= infertile. They could use a surrogate or artificial means if they wanted to.


They can even have sex with someone and get them/get pregnant. It just very unlikely they would want to use that method. Usually in such cases it's before they come out and accept how they feel.

1 % I would , I am living with my mom because my dad is an alcoholic and he abused or slave or raped (TRANSLATING TO ENGLISH IS A CHALLENGE FOR ME) me and my mom


No problem, do your best. The likely word would be abused. Unless your dad had sex with you against your will.
 

Posted May 25, '13 at 3:49am

partydevil

partydevil

5,119 posts

99 % kids would not care

maybe if you quoted, then we would know what you think kids dont care about.
(SO I DON'T AGREE)

you dont agree because you dont know... thats stupid.

IT WILL AFFECT his life when he grew up or goes in puberty , maybe he will start to love a person same sex / gender

gay parents do not automatically make gay children. neither is something wrong whit it if it was the case.

Could be bulied and thrown from society

so because they might get bullied, we have to outlaw it?
and in countries where they will be "thrown from society" it most likely isn't allowed to begin whit. so thats a useless argument.
 

Posted May 25, '13 at 6:10am

partydevil

partydevil

5,119 posts

you dont agree because you dont know... thats stupid.

actually, thats mostly good. just not here xD
 

Posted Jan 29, '14 at 8:05pm

abt79

abt79

61 posts

As it does not affect me or anyone else but them, I am fine with these people making decisions that do not harm anyone else, it is a right as much as stuffing yourself obese is. Do I think it is a sin? Yes. But it is their decision.

 
Reply to Marriage equality

You must be logged in to post a reply!