Forums

ForumsWorld Events, Politics, Religion, Etc.

[necro]Nazi unit leader found in US

Thread Locked

Posted Jun 24, '13 at 2:56am

partydevil

partydevil

5,109 posts

the ones who didnt wanted to act like that, didnt. All of these peoples belived in what they did. They belived so even befor Hitler came to power.

hmm these people could also be forced by the public opinion.
if you didn't kill then like the rest of the village then you will be the traitor among them. and you probably die like the jews they are killing....

also can the village in france just have been afraid for the german razzias.
they might have been so afraid that they toke more people away then just the jews that they killed the jews by themself so that the germans work would have been done and that there no non-jews would be taken during such a razzia.

making the instand jump to. they believe it is right and they did it because they could. is just wrong....

Europe can redo the holocaoust in a blink of an eye if only they got the "excuse". We can see it in greece, we can see itin Hungary.

what conspiracies have you been reading?
europe can't redo the holocaust in a blink of an eye. europe has grown together. countries are not separate anymore. 1 crazy france leader can't just start another holocaust like that....

i dont know what you are seeing in greece and hungary but it by no means looks even close to a holocaust. in greece there is just a crisis. i have yet to see 1 argument speaking of killing greeks for what they didn't do.
hungary has a mad man in power atm. but he is not able to do anything.. period. much like the mad man we have walking around in my country. (luckily tho is our mad man not popular anymore)

Thefunny thing is, that the european can still be the judges of the world, say who is right and who is wrong. And apearently Israel is always wrong.

europe judges over europe. the UN judges internationally. and yes this is also done in europe but it's internationally. so it doesn't matter where it is. it is for everyone and not for europe. if the international court was in asia then asia would still be the judges of the world. if it was in australia then australia was the judges of the world. etc. etc.

apearently Israel is always wrong.

israel's existences is wrong.

 

Posted Jun 24, '13 at 3:30am

danielo

danielo

1,397 posts

Belive me, i always say that in the right "timing" there are groups in Israel which will murdur me and anyone who think like me and rise a fascit regiem. And there are not so few of these peoples unforteunly. But yet, i like it when England say we kill innocent peoples in Gaza and then bomb a civil convoy in Iraq because there was a terrorist among them, eveb that in the "cast lead" opretion the rate of civil per hostile armed personal causalties was the smallest in the last 50 years. They even sent peoples from there amry for lessons in Israel.

Oh, and these atone throwes scum? They are getting throwned to prison. Israel is kick them out of these settlments again and again, as they build again and again like ants. We do try, but the peoples of the UN dont care for such things. When Gaza shot 3 rockets last week, does the UN said anything? When Assad troops shot ony friend at the border (he is ok), does the nerwigian human right activiest said anything? But when we retaliate, BOOM! "Israel want war with Syria! They want to conquoer the world!".

Everyone who know me know that i am a left winger. That i support a Palestinian country and against Racism with all my heart. I can tell you that there are more "hate crimes" in France then there is in Israel.

Its ok to judge, but why are i need to live in a none stop judging by the world?

 

Posted Jun 24, '13 at 5:39am

partydevil

partydevil

5,109 posts

when England say we kill innocent peoples in Gaza and then bomb a civil convoy in Iraq

the UK is not the EU.
far from it.

Israel is kick them out of these settlments again and again, as they build again and again like ants. We do try,

by taking their culture and land?
and breaking down their houses is help?

When Gaza shot 3 rockets last week, does the UN said anything?

why should they? if it isn't news, then there is nothing to say.
if the UN is going to say something every time something happens there. then they dont have time for anything else anymore. it's not like it can solve any of the mess. israel was lucky enough that the usa recognized it as country and that others followed after that.
the whole mess there is all the cause of israel anyway. and why? freaking god...

When Assad troops shot ony friend at the border

one shooting. if you dont look for the media then nothing will happen. and if you do then your just 1 voice. if you can get the whole village going to the media. the UN might say a word about it.
and the news from syria itself is of course more interesting then israel.

does the nerwigian human right activiest said anything?

.... what? ....
again. why should they?

But when we retaliate, BOOM! "Israel want war with Syria! They want to conquoer the world!

israel conquoer the world? lol, good luck whit that. xD
you try 1 more invasion you get the world on your arse. after all, israel shouldn't exists by itself.

Its ok to judge, but why are i need to live in a none stop judging by the world?

because of the way your country has come to existence (again).

 

Posted Jun 24, '13 at 7:14am

nichodemus

nichodemus

12,177 posts

Knight

Sure. But wsome suggested that he is not guilty because of that reason.

Yes, but he is top brass after all, and not a lowly rank and file soldier.

 

Posted Jul 2, '13 at 11:06pm

Wyrzen

Wyrzen

325 posts

I have mixed emotions.

I mean he's ninety-four freaking years old, but he also committed many atrocities or at least allowed them to happen. I just feel he'd die in his trial since he's so old and justice takes awhile, even for high-priority stuff like this.

I'm glad I don't have to decide. I have trouble taking a solid stance on most things; I just see both sides really well whether I want to or not.

 

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 7:28am

partydevil

partydevil

5,109 posts

he lived ninety-four freaking years in freedom. he had that luck his whole life already.
make it justice for all the families he has ordered actrocities upon. and convict him for his deeds.
age shouldn't matter to justice. only bad health can a case to be temporarily closed because the suspect needs medical attention.
so unless this man is in such bad conditions that he needs constant medical care. he should just be summoned before a judge.

 

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 8:55am

Wyrzen

Wyrzen

325 posts

Don't get me wrong, he deserves to pay, I totally agree with that. I'm just thinking that like, incarcerating him isn't feasible due to his age and health. Is he really worth our trouble to stick him in a hospital and care for him while he is on trial?

 

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 9:01am

partydevil

partydevil

5,109 posts

incarcerating him isn't feasible due to his age and health.

it's justice.
are people that do a life sentence ever get free due to old age?
and would this guy have gotten a life sentence if he was convicted 50/60 year ago?
either that or death is my guess...

Is he really worth our trouble to stick him in a hospital and care for him while he is on trial?

free health care FTW!
i really can't understand why you americans are against it --.--'

 

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 10:44am

nichodemus

nichodemus

12,177 posts

Knight

I'm just thinking that like, incarcerating him isn't feasible due to his age and health. Is he really worth our trouble to stick him in a hospital and care for him while he is on trial?

Yes. It is feasible, has been done before, and is worth it for the sake of justice.

 

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 11:00am

partydevil

partydevil

5,109 posts

Is he really worth our trouble to stick him in a hospital and care for him while he is on trial?

also:
is it worth to keep someone locked up in prison for a indefinite amount of time (in the usa on average it was 12 year or so. if i remember right) when they have been sentenced to death?