Forums

ForumsVideo Games

Battlefield 4 or COD Ghost?

Posted Sep 16, '13 at 6:22pm

Drink

Drink

1,604 posts

to be honest, i was looking foward to bf4 and even pre ordered it, but once i saw the multiplayer footage it looked too much like bf3.. then i see ghosts looks different, so i switched my pre order, yes i will continue you buy cod for another year

 

Posted Sep 19, '13 at 8:10am

TheMostManlyMan

TheMostManlyMan

4,741 posts

Really guys? Ghosties on the account that BF4 is too similar to its predecessor? What's there left for them to add? That's the thing, CoD can add a buttload of stuff but Battlefield can't because they already have everything in the first place.

@Dink: Because it's not as if everybody thought that about the last 2 Call of Duty's...

 

Posted Sep 20, '13 at 8:20am

pickpocket

pickpocket

5,895 posts

Ghosties on the account that BF4 is too similar to its predecessor?

Yet thats all Battlefield fanboys complain about CoD doing this, then brag about non-existent innovation. My favorite is "The gameplay mechanics dont change". Its an fps, its not going to change! If it changes its not going to be the game anymore!
While on the topic, BF fans annoy the hell out of me. Sure, CoD doesnt have a good community, but Battlefield's is just terrible. They make it their life long goal to go to every YouTube video remotely related to CoD, leave a dislike and start a fps war again. Then they proceed to insult the CoD community as young, when in reality BF's community is just the same.
Battlefield can't because they already have everything in the first place.

It doesnt have everything, it just has no where to go. Try changing your gameplay mechanics.
 

Posted Sep 20, '13 at 12:46pm

KnightDeclan

KnightDeclan

487 posts

Battlefield 4 can't be too much different than Battlefield 3. COD Ghost's has already been confirmed with some really cool new ideas.

 

Posted Sep 20, '13 at 3:30pm

d_dude

d_dude

3,588 posts

Except BF4 has multiple new game modes, and has Commander mode.

"The mode will be playable on a tablet alone, without the requirement of a PC or console. Unlike in previous games, the Commander is not present on the battlefield as a player, and is instead an observer who leads his team from a dedicated screen. Commanders have a number of tools and gadgets at their disposal, and can drop supplies, vehicles, call in missile strikes, and more. The better the squads are doing, the more tools and gadgets the Commander as access to."

This hasn't been in BF3 or BC2, and you guys are completely ignoring its existence. What's new in CoD? A dog? A few game modes and some kill streaks?

 

Posted Sep 20, '13 at 11:15pm

Maverick4

Maverick4

6,891 posts

The issue is that BF has shown that it can and will innovate to make a more enjoyable experience for the gamer. CoD, on the other hand, has been largely stagnant. The largest jump was from CoD4 to MW2; since then its largely plateaued as far as innovations have occurred.

Then theres the fact that Activision is horrible at actually implementing things; it either rips straight out of other games and passes it off as unique, or has highly linear, scripted events that make it more like a movie and less like a game.

Commander in BF is more innovative then say, Kill Confirmed. Cross Platform integreation is likely the future: Wii U has dabbled with the pad-device thing, BF Commander will be from a seperate device, Ubisoft will have a Watchdog's app to assist actual gamers. And CoD has... A console.

Not to mention there hasn't been a balanced gun game since CoD4... Nearly five years ago. I shouldn't be able to absolutely r*pe people with a UMP 45/MP7/ACR/SCAR/FAMAS because the gun is just that OP. Or the fact that AR/SMGs are the only useful weapons to use since the maps are pathetically small and poorly designed at that.

But implying CoD is somehow better because it has less stuff in it... That's hilariously painful to read, given the multitude of things BF has that CoD doesn't.

 

Posted Sep 21, '13 at 8:52am

Charlie506

Charlie506

1,315 posts

It looks like Call of duty ghosts is not a good game!
When I saw the mutiplayer Trailer I was not suprised at all!
I'm a BIG fan of call of duty but it looks like there has suprisment. Never ever played a battlefield game before but this might be my first.

 

Posted Sep 21, '13 at 2:30pm

SubZero007

SubZero007

973 posts

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-tncEziQJETCCgULaCEnyw

Youtuber who does really in-depth analysis of Mail Sacks and ViDocs that Bungie release. You should check him out.

 

Posted Sep 21, '13 at 2:32pm

SubZero007

SubZero007

973 posts

Derp, posted that to the wrong thread. Just ignore it, unless you like Destiny, then click on it anyway.

 

Posted Sep 21, '13 at 6:21pm

rychus

rychus

1,301 posts

Oooo destiny I will click

 
Reply to Battlefield 4 or COD Ghost?

You must be logged in to post a reply!