ForumsWEPR[duplicate]What is bad?

9 1452
19912
offline
19912
74 posts
670

We people of another countries have another constitution but there is no single country whose any minister is a rich person!
doesn't we are the ones choosing them?
So tell me who are bad?
We the PEOPLE?
or
The minister's and other people standing and wining election's?
what do you think?
why those are rich and much are poor???
Corrupt corrupt corrupt corrupt corrupt corrupt corrupt
http://somalilandsun.com/images/officer.jpg

  • 9 Replies
HahiHa
offline
HahiHa
6,904 posts
21,160
19912
offline
19912
74 posts
670

well it's not a threat for corruption but it is a question ^_^

FishPreferred
offline
FishPreferred
2,864 posts
18,680

Corrupt corrupt corrupt corrupt corrupt corrupt corrupt [propaganda cartoon]


This is not a question, nor any component thereof.

With regard to the actual questions:

1. Politicians are people too, believe it or not.
2. You need to spend a lot of money to get noticed in politics, unless you're already a celebrity.
3. If they're already rich to begin with, why assume that they're going to embezzle more than a poor individual?
MacII
offline
MacII
1,348 posts
1,395

What's bad? This is

pangtongshu
offline
pangtongshu
9,995 posts
3,285

Jeepers, I wonder if this thread was made with any generalized bias.

Also..I'm not sure what you are getting at with your OP..it's quite hard to follow. Something about corrupt and then black people

MattEmAngel
offline
MattEmAngel
7,836 posts
4,340

Given that the definition of "bad" varies so frequently, depending on the person and what their actions are, I think I will go with "If it is against the rules or the law, it is bad" for now. Rather than it being based on personal preference, the Constitution (for example) was written by a wide variety of men with differing opinions in the best interest of the people. The would would go to pieces if everyone was allowed to live on their own definition of "bad" because everyone would also have a definition of "justice."

A brief example might be: A man does not think it is bad to steal to feed a starving family. He breaks into the house of a man who does not think it is bad to kill is self-defense and killing an intruder is "justified." Another person thinks that "an eye for an eye" is justified and kills the homeowner.

Granted, we have a lot of rules going into effect that people disagree on for a variety of reasons, but as a baseline value I would use the American Constitution as a measurement of what is "bad." It doesn't cover EVERY action, but it's a good start.

MattEmAngel
offline
MattEmAngel
7,836 posts
4,340

Sorry, had a couple typos in there.

The *world would go to pieces

to kill *in self-defense

Kennethhartanto
offline
Kennethhartanto
248 posts
7,980

Ehm you may need to start to define in what spectrum of time and space where your "bad" definition is. it varies extremely between groups of people.

Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,562 posts
4,140

Follow that liiiiink.

Showing 1-9 of 9