ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78397 46164831
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,397 Replies
abcdragon66
offline
abcdragon66
701 posts
Jester

√256. Let's just count with the square roots. Or even better, with any other form of the number.

HahiHa
offline
HahiHa
8,259 posts
Regent

I'm afraid I cannot let this pass. You can add any other kind of variation of the number, but the correct number must be clearly present in the post, at the beginning of the post or in bold.
edit: Just to make sure I'm not misunderstood, all the previous posts were fine (as they contained the correct number in bold) except for that last one.

lithium923
offline
lithium923
80 posts
Templar

1. Great job guys, only 99 numbers to go!

Olaffours
offline
Olaffours
392 posts
Prince

2. yeah i agree with HahiHa, without the number, it will be a painfuff job to check if the winning count is good or not, and even for the counters lol. maybe it could be a new variation of the count to xx game ? like the count to 500, etc in a new thread ?

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

3. Once I saw somewhere a game Count to 1000. But imagine a reset in such game xD

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

log₃(81) (4) Hmmm... I'll use logarithms too
(yeah, I had googled √)

lithium923
offline
lithium923
80 posts
Templar

6. I don't know how you manage to never mess up a haiku.....

Majestic_Fish
offline
Majestic_Fish
1,917 posts
Chancellor

7. She thinks before posting. Not like us.
BTW, my classmates are dancing during a lesson hour. Truly a carefree class.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

8. And what was teacher doing? Was he/she the DJ?

Olaffours
offline
Olaffours
392 posts
Prince

9. or maybe it was a dancing lesson and you didn't know ?

XxTattyKxX
offline
XxTattyKxX
12 posts
Jester

10. Either way, sounds cool.

abcdragon66
offline
abcdragon66
701 posts
Jester

11. I am absolutely terrible at dancing. Also sorry guys for resetting the count last time

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

12. Don't worry, your number was correct, it just wasn't drawn out of a square root. I even wasn't sure, if that's good. There were people counting binary numbers and there were restarts as well.

XxTattyKxX
offline
XxTattyKxX
12 posts
Jester

14. 👏👏

sciller45
online
sciller45
2,854 posts
Justiciar

15.

2.4 No counter may post only the number or gibberish with the number.

So, @XxTattyKxX, Is it considered against the rules or not? All I see are two white squares.

Showing 70861-70875 of 78397