ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78377 46094378
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,377 Replies
Jasza676
offline
Jasza676
225 posts
Count

32 Yet I do not like some newer stuff from this year. And I still prefer normal mage mid over assassin one.

Olinser
offline
Olinser
650 posts
King

33. It's better than last year, where it was practically the zed-ahri show every game. There has been a pretty decent amount of ziggs-xerath-orianna this split.

Krissan
offline
Krissan
91 posts
Scribe

34. I can manage to follow Dota games, but I have a fragile brain and shouldn't try to cram more heroes into it.

xXxDAPRO89xXx
offline
xXxDAPRO89xXx
6,737 posts
Baron

35. It's a me, tree!

Olinser
offline
Olinser
650 posts
King

36. Heh, C9 has already pretty much sealed this game. Unless they make a major misplay the first game is theirs. 2 more to seal the series! UNDER 30 EDIT

lmba
offline
lmba
21 posts
Lord

37. it's a me shield!

Jasza676
offline
Jasza676
225 posts
Count

38. And IMO Jinx is the worst champion design ever created.

Olinser
offline
Olinser
650 posts
King

39. Like... from a gameplay standpoint, or from an appearance/fluff standpoint

Krissan
offline
Krissan
91 posts
Scribe

40. I have nothing to contribute to the conversation at the moment.

alaNcmL
offline
alaNcmL
11 posts
Constable

41. creating a sentence after the number is just annoying

Rychip
offline
Rychip
147 posts
Peasant

42. I never have anything to contribute to the conversation.

Olinser
offline
Olinser
650 posts
King

43. Then clearly we need to re-visit bacon and it's greatness.

Rychip
offline
Rychip
147 posts
Peasant

44. Agreed, bacon is amazing.

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

45. I do like a bacon sandwedge.

Fyrhazrd
offline
Fyrhazrd
83 posts
Prince

46. I dont have much to say

Showing 8071-8085 of 78377