ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78286 45597399
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,286 Replies
LouTheLarge
offline
LouTheLarge
11 posts
Nomad

7. Moderators have nothing on us lads

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

1. All of the fail right there.

Crickster
offline
Crickster
1,795 posts
Blacksmith

2. how much facepalms do i need

Arverniraider24
offline
Arverniraider24
1,088 posts
Peasant

3. I just realized how redundant the new game title is.

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

4. I don't understand.

Arverniraider24
offline
Arverniraider24
1,088 posts
Peasant

5. The title is quest for a secret quest. that's questing for a quest. It's redundant.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

6. Maybe that's part of the secret.

Arverniraider24
offline
Arverniraider24
1,088 posts
Peasant

7. Maybe.

Akatsuki_Kojou
offline
Akatsuki_Kojou
199 posts
Viceroy

8. Almost at 10 now.

Arverniraider24
offline
Arverniraider24
1,088 posts
Peasant

9. DON'T JINX US!!

Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The mods were able to make it to 98 by cheating.

Even though they've reached 100, users have not been able to make it that high perfectly. Instead, you got people who start ninja-ing each other and counting the numbers from 90-100 twenty times with like four 99s and a 96 that comes before 95.

I'm not sure if there ever was a perfect count to 100.

Arverniraider24
offline
Arverniraider24
1,088 posts
Peasant

1. SEE?!

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

2. I must stop using anything other than my computer to post these things. I accidentally reported the g-rabbits post.

Arverniraider24
offline
Arverniraider24
1,088 posts
Peasant

3. Yeah, might wnt to switch.

Akatsuki_Kojou
offline
Akatsuki_Kojou
199 posts
Viceroy

4. I wasted all this time lurking in the thread linked above. . .

Showing 826-840 of 78286