ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78397 46177219
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,397 Replies
wookie1196
offline
wookie1196
856 posts
Jester

XXXVII. I think we should change the subject

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(38) alright so...
errr... *thinks a lot* *1 week later* alright! I know about what we could talk! we could talk about- hey, wait, I forgot it! D:

xmarianek9
offline
xmarianek9
1 posts
Constable

39 Let's continue

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

40. I'm dumping in coins but nothing is happening!

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

ne: (41) - oh, another neighbor.

wookie1196
offline
wookie1196
856 posts
Jester

XLII. And this is where roman numerals get complex

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

43. Them Romans be crazy. Forcing all roads to go to Rome and using letters as numbers!

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

44. What about Egyptians?

wookie1196
offline
wookie1196
856 posts
Jester

XLV. The Egyptians were worse. They didn't have negative numbers

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

46. So Indians were better....

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

:seven47) Depends which kind you mean.

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

48. There are many actually....

FishPreferred
offline
FishPreferred
3,171 posts
Duke

49. Neither the Romans nor the Egyptians had negative numbers. The Egyptians did have zero, however, which put them well ahead of the Romans.

Patrick2011
online
Patrick2011
12,321 posts
Treasurer

L (50). This is the halfway point.

Loop_Stratos
offline
Loop_Stratos
5,291 posts
Jester

51. "It's About time."
"To what?"
"To reset!"

Showing 50431-50445 of 78397