ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78377 46055250
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,377 Replies
lithium923
offline
lithium923
80 posts
Templar

44. Oh yeah. Thanks Luis. Demons Vs Fairyland.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

45. In KoT you are either lucky and put effort (new server + getting everything possible) or you have to pay to make quests quickly. I don't get why did they do 300 stars quest seriously.

luis3141
offline
luis3141
73 posts
Prince

46. LOL, agree on King of Towers being the worst. Sad thing is, it wouldnt take too many changes to make it a GREAT game i think.

lithium923
offline
lithium923
80 posts
Templar

47. I would have to agree with you. If they took the stupid pay to win feature out it might become a pretty great game.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

48. What can I say? Devs made extremely powerful enemies instead of making another stages, so people have more fun. The difficulty steeps too rapidly.

luis3141
offline
luis3141
73 posts
Prince

49. Ok, We made it to 50%, we can do it!!! Any other great games?

lithium923
offline
lithium923
80 posts
Templar

50. Any John game is guaranteed to be good.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

51. That's one thing. One from another is how hard is to get rarer resources. It's literally pay to win, without resources you can't advance in some stages.

luis3141
offline
luis3141
73 posts
Prince

52. The "Dont give up" series is just plain evil. That one is preaty hard.

lithium923
offline
lithium923
80 posts
Templar

53. Give Up was pretty easy in my opinion, but Give Up 2 is something else. I'm still trying to beat the game.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

54. ... and the last complaint (sorry for offtopic rn) &quotrobability system" is scammed. And that's KoT. Period.

luis3141
offline
luis3141
73 posts
Prince

55. How long have you guys been trying to complete this quest?

lithium923
offline
lithium923
80 posts
Templar

56. Today was the first day I tried to complete this quest. We got really close but a (you know what) stopped us.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

57. I have same opinion about GU and GU2. GU was hard and fan, and GU2 is just extremely hard. And I have this quest from a long time ago.

luis3141
offline
luis3141
73 posts
Prince

58. Yeah, i think it is "Dont Give Up 2", the one with the extra stages right? You definetly need a couple of hours to complete that one.

Showing 70621-70635 of 78377