ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78288 45610972
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,288 Replies
Tactical_Fish
offline
Tactical_Fish
776 posts
Blacksmith

4. Raon had posted with no number, so I posted 22, then he edited to make his 22.

Patrick2011
offline
Patrick2011
12,321 posts
Treasurer

5. That's one reason why his strategy is not a good idea.

kalkanadam
offline
kalkanadam
797 posts
Peasant

6Yeah if raon made it numberlles and storm made 24. It would have been fine.

StormWalker
offline
StormWalker
8,232 posts
Jester

7. Raon, your strategy sounds good for only a few people, but with maybe six playing in and out at different internet speeds, I don't think it'll be that successful.

RaonAbsoluteZERO
offline
RaonAbsoluteZERO
91 posts
Constable

8 True, well there are some things we can do

TiSe88
offline
TiSe88
432 posts
King

9. How many people are playing right now?

Tactical_Fish
offline
Tactical_Fish
776 posts
Blacksmith

10. I posted an order on my profile, it will be deleted in 5 minutes.

Patrick2011
offline
Patrick2011
12,321 posts
Treasurer

11. As far as editing goes, I have plenty of internet speed, but this isn't true for everyone.

StormWalker
offline
StormWalker
8,232 posts
Jester

12. All right fish.

TiSe88
offline
TiSe88
432 posts
King

13. ok start it tactical fish

Tactical_Fish
offline
Tactical_Fish
776 posts
Blacksmith

14. Consider this the first post in the order.

kalkanadam
offline
kalkanadam
797 posts
Peasant

15.alight you start. Fish. No one posts until the person below you posts.

Patrick2011
offline
Patrick2011
12,321 posts
Treasurer

16. Then this is the 2nd post in the order.

StormWalker
offline
StormWalker
8,232 posts
Jester

17. I am number 3.

kalkanadam
offline
kalkanadam
797 posts
Peasant

18. This is fun

Showing 6751-6765 of 78288