well i dont know. maybe people out there hate swearing and are really offended when the see swearing so its just basically keeping it fair to all audiences.
i agree, i think su.ck should not be blocked, but i also agree with nick coolhaha. i think there should be some kind of comprimise, for example, keep the offensive swear words blocked, but allow some swear words. nothing bad offcourse. like words that u can say in front of a teacher outside in the playground
i see dank's point. but i dont think su.cks is offensive, however, that is MY opinion. but this is a 13+ site, and -13 year olds dont belong here, they are ruining the fun for all of us. anyways, we cant do much about that. i guess the blocking system is good the way it is, but i still think su.ck shouldnt be blocked
Yes, and in the rules it does say not to use EXCESSIVE swearing. I will agree that some of the words starred out is frustrating and offensive to me. I am sorely bothered that g.ay is starred out.
I agree with you, Falling. But there needs to be an adjustment to some of the starred words. G.ay being one, s.ucks being another. Not to mention I've seen user names with the f bomb in it. The inconsistencies are frustrating.
If there was swearing just think if there were kids out there on this site and there parents see them playing and someone starts to swear, they might not trust this site again...
* the kid dose not get to come to the site anymore * Armorgames would rcieve a bad rep