A new way of ranks. We should make a system that tells you how much APs in order to beat the person you're after and how much APs that you just pass! Like for explain:Here's Bob(he's rank 812th)! He has 1000AP and he needs 107AP to be rank 811th! And also he's 13AP ahead of rank 813th!I didn't made names for 813th and 811th hope you didn't get confuse with that.lol
This has been suggested before and is a good idea, but it would be a lot of trouble to put in. Usually if you are below the 100 ranks you can get 10 up and go up a few ranks, so it doesn't matter anyway.
they should do it for the less than 100 ranked players because 100 ranks are seen in the top 100..oh and also quit accounts should have 0 ap! why you ask? because theyre just taking up space in the top 100 and all rankings!
A new way of ranks. We should make a system that tells you how much APs in order to beat the person you're after and how much APs that you just pass! Like for explain:Here's Bob(he's rank 812th)! He has 1000AP and he needs 107AP to be rank 811th! And also he's 13AP ahead of rank 813th!I didn't made names for 813th and 811th hope you didn't get confuse with that.lol
So, you're saying you single handidly want to be responsible for the surge of spam that would appear from this idea? That's what'll happen, there's no if's, and's or but's about it. You'll lose the semi-competitive edge of AG, and turn it into a points whoring contest (well, it kind of already is).
I mean, does it really matter who's ahead of you, and who's not? I've been bouncing back and forth from #198, to #200, to #204, to #205, back to #200, etc. It's kind of saddening that a person would actually be concerned and make it their goal to beat the next person :|
