Community

CommunitySupport Forum

Flagging serverity

Posted Feb 28, '08 at 4:53pm

LordBob

LordBob

533 posts

Mods are alwats busy, usually going through many l flags thing that are just normal, but meanwhile you've spooted some horrible link to a BAD site. So i suggest a 1-5 scale of flagging so they can respond to more serious flags quicker.

here's a scale (just for an example)

1-cursing and double posting
2-flagging
3- spam and mini-city links
4-stealing (images and credit)
5-excuse my frenchpornogrophy

thats my suggestion.

 

Posted Feb 28, '08 at 5:06pm

mrtim

mrtim

2,056 posts

or what they could do is when we click on a flag... a drop down list appears (which will be the things you've provided plus some more if possible) we then click on the reason and the mods will check it.....saves mods time trying to figure out why we flagged

 

Posted Feb 28, '08 at 5:45pm

SwitchFoot

SwitchFoot

45 posts

dank, as moderator, is there a thing that shows flagged comments? or are you supposed to find them yourselves?

 

Posted Feb 28, '08 at 6:25pm

3DoorsDown

3DoorsDown

22 posts

well if this makes you happy, your comment has just been flagged! Learn to zip it and post nicely!

 

Posted Feb 28, '08 at 6:28pm

Asherlee

Asherlee

5,098 posts

Drum, there is no reason to be rude or to flame another member. Don't let me catch you doing it again. Especially in the topic about flagging. What were YOU thinking?

 

Posted Feb 28, '08 at 6:29pm

LordBob

LordBob

533 posts

opps a mistake

2 is supposed to be "flamming" not "flagging"

 

Posted Feb 28, '08 at 6:37pm

SwitchFoot

SwitchFoot

45 posts

umm what is 3dd talking about, and exactly who?

 

Posted Feb 28, '08 at 6:46pm

Asherlee

Asherlee

5,098 posts

Well, above him was idrumtoomuch's post.

 

Posted Feb 28, '08 at 10:30pm

idrumtomuch

idrumtomuch

116 posts

I wasn't flaming.  I was simply stating the truth.

 

Posted Feb 28, '08 at 10:58pm

Tydus

Tydus

264 posts

I do agree with being able to specify what infraction a review breaks, but I think the numbering system is quite unnecessary.  At that point, each users specific judgment of severity must be called into question, which means more trouble than the system would fix.  Thus we'd have to deal with flagging suspensions and whatnot, something this site doesn't necessarily need.  The admin back-end here isn't as stable as it should be anyway, but that was last time I checked with Dan.

 
Reply to Flagging serverity

You must be logged in to post a reply!