Just because the game is rated badly, doesn't mean that everyone doesn't like it, it just means that a majority of people who have played the game do not like it. I don't see why we should remove games with a lower rating, it isn't doing any harm to the site.
I agree. I think this site should be filled with only good games. Spammers rate stuff low on purpose sometimes, though. What if it was if they had to have over 500 ratings, but if it was still under 3 it should be deleted.
Err... Black Wolf, you DO realize what will happen if we delete this game right? Pages worth of spam would be deleted, costing users lots--- wait a minute... Pages of spam... Well that's the only good thing that would come out of deleting games, but that's beside the point! No matter if users think it's a terrible game, a game is still a game.
1) As stated above, game developers would be mad if their game got deleted. 2) Some users may not be honest enough and rate it under 3. 3) Some people may like the game 4) people who got merits would lose their 25 points
All of those are the reasons not too do it.
Ok we don't delete a game right? Spammers don't lose AP. Well flag their comments 5 times! It's easy! Open up about 5 tabs of the same page and flag flag and flag some more.
I liked Creakwood Forest and its the lowest rated game on the site I rated it 7.5.10 and its like 2.3/10 why should it be removed people spen their time on those games.
I think delete games would be anti-democratic. Badly rated games are loved by some people. I would not like to see one of my favourite games deleted just because most of the people don't like it...
