Community

CommunityWorld Events, Politics, Religion, Etc.

Should the US be in Iraq?

Thread Locked

Posted Mar 22, '08 at 6:22pm

Mustang2653

Mustang2653

29 posts

I think the US shouldn't because look how much we have spent there and the troops we lost i say get out of there now before we lose more people than we already have

Posted Mar 22, '08 at 6:24pm

dirkpitt1

dirkpitt1

1,202 posts

of course not, just another example of how the US sticks their nose in where id doesnt belong and gets a bee sting from it.

 

Posted Mar 22, '08 at 6:26pm

Jikek

Jikek

1,255 posts

no we just need more security here. We went there because of 9/11.

 

Posted Mar 22, '08 at 6:27pm

chiliad_nodi

chiliad_nodi

648 posts

 

Posted Mar 24, '08 at 12:13pm

Glusch

Glusch

107 posts

I really dont think that USA should be in Iraq but if they not are in Iraq the people in Iraq will continue kill and be terrorrist... I really dont know what I think but I probebly think its not good at all. :/?

 

Posted Mar 24, '08 at 12:33pm

Calm

Calm

937 posts

Mates, there's already a thread about this war, as chiliad_nodi said before.
Post your replies there.

 

Posted Mar 24, '08 at 12:35pm

murftheman

murftheman

77 posts

Someone in another thread said this.

"Anyone who is attacking the Iraq war, STOP and read this before continuing.

In Iraq, the government was controlled by one man who used mass genocide and fear to make sure the people "loved" him. He was the enemy of free peoples around the world. Iraq was harboring terrorists, and we have evidence that suggests that they DID have WMDs before the inspectors went in, but moved them out across the border. They were known to have high-ranking terrorists hidden in their country, some from a certain radical Islamic group that attacked America, and we could NOT let them continue to hide there. The war was not about oil. Not at the beginning, not now, not ever. The countries who tried to stop us were concerned with oil and tried to convince us not to invade in order to protect their trade with Iraq."

 

Posted Mar 24, '08 at 12:36pm

yo619

yo619

140 posts

No, if george w. bush continues this half of our population will be wiped out.

 

Posted Mar 24, '08 at 12:45pm

manofomens

manofomens

4 posts

I do not believe that we should have invaded Iraq in the first place. As I have stated in other threads, Iraq was a grave tactical error. In spite of that, however, we can not just leave right now. Equally true, continuing pushing forward is decreasing our national security. Therefore, I believe that we must keep a maintaining force in Iraq to keep stability and we must also enact solitary strikes against Al Qeida. At this point, if Iraq can be secured then we will have two valid entry points into the middle east (tactically speaking), this includes Israel. At this point, why we went into Iraq is irrelevant. We are in Iraq now, so we must view the war as it is. Also, the casualty rates of Iraq are very good. We have had hardly any casualties compared to EVERY OTHER WAR in US history.

 

Posted Mar 24, '08 at 12:47pm

murftheman

murftheman

77 posts

Really!! Lets see here... hundreds of millions of us are going to die?

 

Posted Mar 24, '08 at 12:47pm

Carlie

Carlie

6,917 posts

Administrator

Please see this previous topic, and post further comments there:
http://armorgames.com/community/thread/ … e-iraq-war

Thanks!