Well if we are going to be pointing blades i think it was Vise. I find him to be a very strange person.

Well if we are going to be pointing blades i think it was Vise. I find him to be a very strange person.

What motive would he have?

As far as motive and suspects are concerned I believe another thing to consider could have been a flame shot by someone in a flame war. Remember what they believe caused this:

Possibly a flame bomb ignited all the surplus flour hanging in the air causing it to explode

Something I also want to know is what happened to the banana king. He ran off and is known to be...a bit crazy, so he could have been responsible for this incident possibly. Again I don't think that any of the victestants here are responsible at this point.

What motive would he have?

That is a good point. I cant think of any other  contestants with a motive to do such a thing. Then again who says the contestants did anything for sure?

Who is to say that it wasn't Snelly or Flipper?
They both seem somewhat.... ditzy. Maybe it was all a horrible accident caused by the two.

"So you did blow up the cake?"
"Flipper, please be queit."
"I want fish...."
"Flipper, please stop."
"BUT MY TUMMY IS EMPTY! I HAVEN'T EATEN iN A HALF HOUR!!!!"
"Skipper, thats not a long time."
"Fine, but you blew up the cake."
*snelly sigh*

Leon says: OK, I'll be frank: Strop is the enemy. We don't need to find who, but why. Motive. If we have a motive, we win. If not, he wins.

Well what if the motive was that it was an accident?

Leon says: Nope. We were called here. We're part of the trial. It's no coincidence. We know why the building was blown up: It's a test. We need to know why whoever did it specifically did it.

Not that any of it actually matters.

Of course, they've called us here with no evidence.  Nothing to base our assumptions on besides our own perceptions, which vary from person to person.  we're trying to come to a consensus here; and so this is pretty much infinitely inconclusive.  Meaning that it's supposed ti be inconclusive, because it's part of the trial.  Meaning that this entire discussion is set up.  The whole thing was obviously staged to try and initiate a squabble.

And so, we now have but one question to answer:  who put this ****storm together?

That could be the motive too - someone wants us to be thrown into sharp relief by a whodunit mystery such as this.  The motive is to diffuse our confidence, so we'll be easier prey later on in the trial.

Now, there are only two people who'd want to do that.  Cen and Strop.

Leon says: Way to sum up what I just said. Which is what I've been saying from the start. All that togetherness stuff. You thought I was just odd.