Community

COD WORLD at WAR VS HALO!

Posted Oct 26, '09 at 5:42pm

Fox159

Fox159

214 posts

Iron - Knight

Love Call of Duty so realistic and great weapons.

 

Posted Oct 27, '09 at 12:58pm

muffinman08

muffinman08

441 posts

Wood - Knight

halo outa these two, there are definatly better games than halo but cod:waw is pretty lame, only good thing was nazi zombies ( which i admit is pretty awesome , even if you dont have the new maps which are much better)

 

Posted Oct 31, '09 at 10:45pm

Fox159

Fox159

214 posts

Iron - Knight

Nazi Zombies aren't the only good thing. Online is good too.

 

Posted Oct 31, '09 at 10:51pm

RttaM

RttaM

30 posts

Gold - Serf

To compare totally different genres of games, is like comparing Ketchup to Mustard.

For starters while both games are FPS (First Person Shooters), they are in no way what so ever in the same category.

Halo is a First Person set in a futuristic world. While Call of Duty: World at War is set World War II.

Big Difference.

 

Posted Oct 31, '09 at 10:56pm

iWazBord

iWazBord

1,266 posts

Iron - Prince

THANK YOU RttaM. Finally someone who notices that!

For the topic's sake... *rolls eyes*

I'd rather play Halo 3 over World at War. Mostly because Halo 3 is THE first FPS I have played, and with custom games it's really fun. ODST isn't that great. Campaign was pretty short in my opinion.

 

Posted Nov 1, '09 at 2:53pm

RenegadePlayer

RenegadePlayer

216 posts

Wood - Lord

I never played halo 3 really... but im in love with WAW and im not even sure ill play MW2 because im so in love with WaW :P its not for nazi zombies either

 
Reply to COD WORLD at WAR VS HALO!

You must be logged in to post a reply!