Forums → WEPR → [redirected]If God created all things
| 1849 | 255430 |
- 1,849 Replies
| 1849 | 255430 |
Here is something to get the brain going. It's been said that God created ALL things. Also it's been said that God is 100 precent pure/good. So God created man and it was said that because of man's sinful actions bad/evil things were created. But if God created ALL things then God created bad/evil things, not man. So by God creating bad/evil things this does not make him 100 precent pure/good.
God withdraw from man to make his own decisions, and it also said god is love, thus allowing us to learn between good and evil,
idk if someone said this allready but satan doesnt even come into the old tetimit for a while if at all, with adam and eve it was that evil snake(which god created) not satan so...
faith has no basis in fact
I feel my arguement was not truly considered.
idk if someone said this allready but satan doesnt even come into the old tetimit for a while if at all, with adam and eve it was that evil snake(which god created) not satan so...
How so? Don't factual things originate from faith on the particular subject, that leads to it being proven true.
However, that evil snake was the "vessel" of Satan, which tempted Eve to take the fruit from the tree and eat it.
Due to your denial of all other arguments.
Where does it say the snake was Satan?
Can someone who has been in this topic early on give a quick rundown of the issues at hand. Because so far I am seeing a lot of hazy claims from the Bible.
I guess, my points won't be too valued here. Because I won't accept any truths from the bible.
Can someone who has been in this topic early on give a quick rundown of the issues at hand. Because so far I am seeing a lot of hazy claims from the Bible.
Can someone who has been in this topic early on give a quick rundown of the issues at hand. Because so far I am seeing a lot of hazy claims from the Bible.
I guess, my points won't be too valued here. Because I won't accept any truths from the bible.
the theist should step outside there belief God is all good and look at what is actually written about this being. The atheist should step outside and work from the assertion that this is real and if so, is this a being you would even want to follow.
This would not be so difficult for me to do if the theists would lay aside their beliefs for a moment. Should the atheists be the one's who only lay aside their beliefs then there is nothing to be done.
I don't actually believe the Bible to be true either however I think one of the points here is to step outside your beliefs and look at what is being said as if it were real.
Basically for the sake of argument the theist should step outside there belief God is all good and look at what is actually written about this being. The atheist should step outside and work from the assertion that this is real and if so, is this a being you would even want to follow.
So, we are examining IF what "god" existed?
Also, I am not a theist or an atheist.
My belief system is not that easily categorized. But it would be closer to polytheism, which somewhat can be sub categorized in theism. But given that everyone was talking about a single god, we were interchanging theism and monotheism as the same. But... A single, all-knowing, blah blah blah doesn't make much sense to me. Even the notions you have of "god" probably are not similar to mine.
My belief system is not that easily categorized. But it would be closer to polytheism, which somewhat can be sub categorized in theism.
Thread is locked!