i still insist nintendo. Sure, online may be better with microsoft, but who wants to get sass talked playing cod online by a 7 yr old from india? Nintendo provides a variety of online, downloadable, and local.
i still insist nintendo. Sure, online may be better with microsoft, but who wants to get sass talked playing cod online by a 7 yr old from india? Nintendo provides a variety of online, downloadable, and local.
My list- Nintendo>Sony>microsoft.
That's pretty ironic, you can't even talk using Nintendo, let alone talk to the thousands of 7 year olds on their Wii's.
And every single person has to buy this thing to talk, sounds like another money-waster to me.
I don't understand the point. Having to buy a peripheral to speak over multiplayer is not unique to the Wii nor any Nintendo console. You also have to buy a microphone and headset for the 360 or PC or that tiny earpiece for the PS3. They're all money-wasters so it's no reason to demerit Nintendo and its consoles.
I like different things about Nintendo and Microsoft, I like the games that Microsoft makes but you have to pay to play online and things that should come with the games you have to pay for yet again. Nintendo isn't always out to get your money by making you buy four or five things to just play online And I love legend of Zelda but they have a huge lack of RPGs/Shooters. And I hate how the PS3 can't play PS2 discs! I mean there's a lot of awesome PS2 games!
Well not all 360's chips dont necccascerly melt some last longer than others,it really depends on the use of the xbox360 I probably played mine alot tats why it only lasted a year
Like i said before,some xbox's are different then others