This should help back up my good man Avornes point.

how can it possibly be against human nature? the only was that could be true was if someone had engineered a gene that made people gay, or deliberately changed the chemical balance in a baby?

Being born gay is a natural process, so its definitely not unatural

I don't get what you mean by own system?

As I said before, a gay marriage system.

As for Mage, I was very clear about it. How the hell did yo miss it? I said it like 3 times. Do I really need to quote them? All you do is bring up the same points and ignore my reply.
For the rest, I already answered that so I can work out my copy-past skill but this time I'd pass.

For right to marriage in general I think its fine. Its not like their gay of perpus.
Homosexuality is even explained in a darvinistic way by gay people being part of the duel-sexual people's genes. Duel sexual people have kids in a younger age (they get along better with woman) but die faster so that means they grow in numbers much faster then other people. On the other hand sometimes they bring kids that are completly gay, then they have no children and do not pass on their genes. So the outcome is the total duel sexual - gay community is always about 6% of the population thoughout human history, as long as their aren't prosecuted and killed like in Iran. So that's how i think nature explains the natural 6%.

Homosexuality is even explained in a darvinistic way by gay people being part of the duel-sexual people's genes. Duel sexual people have kids in a younger age (they get along better with woman) but die faster so that means they grow in numbers much faster then other people. On the other hand sometimes they bring kids that are completly gay, then they have no children and do not pass on their genes. So the outcome is the total duel sexual - gay community is always about 6% of the population thoughout human history, as long as their aren't prosecuted and killed like in Iran. So that's how i think nature explains the natural 6%.

Uh...Duel-Sexual? Darvinistic? How do Gay people bring kids that are gay if they can't reproduce? Natural 6%? I'd really like to see some sources.

dual sexual? do you mean by sexual? and this all assumes that there is some sort of gay gene, which i highly doubt

As for Mage, I was very clear about it. How the hell did yo miss it?

No you weren't clear on the exact laws you wanted to restrict from them. As others had also been asking you to clarify. You kept saying they should have different laws or economic rights. This covers a number of fields in marriage.

For right to marriage in general I think its fine.

The part I have issue with is how you want it to be on unequal grounds.

As for the rest it was a bit hard to read.

"darvinistic" I've never heard of darvinistic before.

"Duel sexual people" Do you mean bisexuality or do you mean people with both genders? Either way it's not required in a parent for the child to be homosexual.

"darvinistic" I've never heard of darvinistic before.
The man who is claiming his ancestors were monkey darwins bed time stories.

"Duel sexual people" Do you mean bisexuality ...

He is referring to dual gender people i guess.

As for Mage, I was very clear about it. How the hell did yo miss it?

None of us got it.

Plus to have a new system, it's still alienating homosexuals.
The idea is to have Equal rights.

The man who is claiming his ancestors were monkey darwins bed time stories.

Darwinistic, little dated. Bedtime story huh? You really want to go there with me?