|
Posted Oct 1, '10 at 6:43pm
holt24
1,059 posts
|
How do you know there were no supreme overlords back then?????????
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 1, '10 at 9:57pm
Efan
2,146 posts
|
read some history books. if their was history work on peasants they would have done the same for A GIANT SUPREME OVERLORD!
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 1, '10 at 11:46pm
lllllllllllllllllll
184 posts
|
I don't really know about that. The reason is that people (users) can't even get up to duke or prince. Only like 50-75 people users can, and they're still active. Since there'll be more ranks, there'll be more time to get those ranks.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 2, '10 at 2:37am
knight_34
10,346 posts
|
How do you know there were no supreme overlords back then?????????
I was there back then... Do you want me to ask some other old veterans about this?
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 2, '10 at 3:36am
MRWalker82
3,692 posts
Moderator
|
meh, new ranks are crap. Only nubcakes sugggest new rankss. Seriously, only like 17 people or soemthing are even at the top ranks and you ****tards want MOAR ranks??? piss off...
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 2, '10 at 3:49am
Efan
2,146 posts
|
i was waiting for you to say that you were going to hunt down the morons who made this thread and beat them to a pulp! :)
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 2, '10 at 3:52am
MRWalker82
3,692 posts
Moderator
|
i was waiting for you to say that you were going to hunt down the morons who made this thread and beat them to a pulp! :)
NaH, I don't need to threaten you. I already have your IP and location.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 2, '10 at 4:23am
knight_34
10,346 posts
|
I don't think it's a good idea to venture to a PG13 forum while inebriated.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 2, '10 at 5:51am
GIGAgamer
95 posts
|
i don't agree to the list of mrdaycee, because there is only one person at the ENTIRE site that has reached the emperor rank. it would take ages to reach it! i would shorten the distance between the points needed for the rankings, so that it is more possible that anyone else can get those ranks.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 2, '10 at 8:06am
knight_34
10,346 posts
|
Why? The maximum rank is supposed to denote something significant, a great accomplishment. It should be well worth the amount of work you put into it. The current ranks themselves allow for less progression than the system MrDayCee has proposed.. Heck, the distances MrDayCee has placed are shorter than AG's current distances in some areas. If it were up to me, I'd actually make the distances longer.
|
| |
