|
Posted Oct 4, '10 at 10:24am

Efan
2,146 posts
|
i think we should draw the line at two in between ranks in Lew of my original idea.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 4, '10 at 10:25am

Freakenstein
6,926 posts
Moderator
|
So there's no female 'Earl', it's just Countess again? That is a problem...But just one. The rest is fine!
As for the matter of the length between rank increases...They should be lengthened, but not by too much. Make the rank jumps significantly harder to obtain.
Also, I'm highly in favor of having Earl instead of Count, because Count/Countess is almost as drab as having Prince and Princess. Variety!
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 4, '10 at 10:28am

knight_34
10,346 posts
|
The Count of Monte Cristo.. Argh.
Well, you prefer Earl, I prefer Count. The world is round. :D Let's just wait for Cormyn and that blog post. Then we can commence the outpouring of idea after idea.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 4, '10 at 10:28am

Efan
2,146 posts
|
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 4, '10 at 10:30am

Efan
2,146 posts
|
Apprentice before knight i think is good.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 4, '10 at 10:33am

Freakenstein
6,926 posts
Moderator
|
Earl/Countess, Count/Countess? Somewhat the same concept of Duke/Duchess.
Apprentice before knight i think is good.
I would step up and say "that's not how it was because squires turned into knights in the medieval era" but I would be eating my own words at that point.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 4, '10 at 10:36am

knight_34
10,346 posts
|
Well, before "earl" was equivalent to "count", it was indeed akin to "duke". Who cares, earl and count are still separate ranks.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 4, '10 at 10:39am

Efan
2,146 posts
|
I would step up and say "that's not how it was because squires turned into knights in the medieval era" but I would be eating my own words at that point.
no i don't mind. i am just trying to think of a rank in the squire/knight area.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 4, '10 at 4:41pm

1337Player
1,555 posts
|
@MrDeeCay's list thingamabob.
I thing you should put soldier after squire because wouldn't a soldier be more important than it? And I agree with the other people that you should replace 'Count' with 'Earl'. Etc. Yeah. Everything else is fine.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 4, '10 at 5:54pm

cormyn
2,865 posts
|
I'm going to point Dan's attention to this thread, so he can evaluate the ranks. It's ultimately his call whether we add any new ranks or not, and which point values we'll assign. Remember, too, we may be rebuilding how we calculate and use points, so I'm not sure what that would do to lists like this.
|
| |