|
Posted Oct 12, '10 at 8:41pm

BlackVortex
1,303 posts
|
Don't know if this has been asked/confirmed as I haven't been on the forums alot lately, but will we be able to re-rate games in AG3?
Of course gaining no extra AP or anything, just to change the rating if we click it wrong by accident, or give the wrong rating too soon.
|
|
|
Posted Oct 12, '10 at 8:52pm

shayneii
2,419 posts
|
I'd like this feature.
I agree with you, no extra AP. Sometimes once you get even farther into a game you start to like/dislike it even more. I'd like to see this implemented :)
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 12, '10 at 8:55pm

samy
4,257 posts
|
Completely agree, perhaps though it should cause a loss of one of the AP points in order to deter people from re-rating the game twenty times.
It's a good idea though, I know I've mis-rated games way to many times.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 12, '10 at 9:23pm

shayneii
2,419 posts
|
Completely agree, perhaps though it should cause a loss of one of the AP points in order to deter people from re-rating the game twenty times.
Losing AP makes sense, unless you do it within reason.
I think you should be able to re-rate at least 1 or 2 times. But 3 or more changes is just excessive, and should probably constitute a penalty, as you said.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 12, '10 at 9:40pm

Joe96
2,283 posts
|
Possibly there's a code (I'm no expert on website design, so I really don't have too much to say) where you get AP as long as there is a rating for a game instead of getting AP when you initially rate it.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 12, '10 at 11:28pm

Kyouzou
3,995 posts
|
Maybe a confirm rating button? So you're absolutely sure before you finalize your rating.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 12, '10 at 11:35pm

Freakenstein
6,926 posts
Moderator
|
Why should constant re-rating be penalized? It isn't harmful to anyone. It's not even noticeable to anyone except the owner of the rating. When there are tens of thousands of ratings, one vote wouldn't really matter; it's just a push to the left or the right that isn't significant yet.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 13, '10 at 12:08am

knight_34
10,346 posts
|
I have to agree with Frank. What's wrong with changing your rating? One's opinion of a game may change drastically.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 13, '10 at 1:34am

cormyn
2,865 posts
|
The way I'm storing game ratings right now is robust enough to know you've already been given "karma" for the original rating, but I'd be cautious to let you re-rate something more than +/- only a few points, like +/- 2 points, and only let you re-rate one time. We'd hate for a game to start dropping from a 9.something average to a 2.something average because people got bored.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 13, '10 at 1:43am

knight_34
10,346 posts
|
Hmm.. I didn't realize the blockheaded ways of some could disrupt rating.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 13, '10 at 12:14pm

gaboloth
1,312 posts
|
I think re-rating games is a good idea with no AP adding or losing, but if Cormyn says it will be annoying let's say only a change for user.
A question: if a game is updated, can you modify your rating? Because this is fundamental I think.
|
| |