|
Posted Apr 26, '08 at 6:07pm
6862837
177 posts
|
|
|
|
Posted Apr 26, '08 at 7:44pm
roofie1995
28 posts
|
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 4, '09 at 6:06pm
ilberic
309 posts
|
you have got to be kidding.. Harry Potter is like Lord of the Rings for kids in elementary school. Lord of the Rings is better in every way conceivable.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 4, '09 at 6:12pm
Ernie15
5,362 posts
|
I fell asleep watching LOTR. Harry Potter I can at least watch a whole movie and stay awake...
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 4, '09 at 9:03pm
HoodHulk58
1,036 posts
|
Ok seriously i like harry potter lord of the rings was stupid and boring besides the only good fight scene in the last movie plus lord of the rings sucked and its was totally gay...Harry potter
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 4, '09 at 9:13pm
TSL3_needed
3,613 posts
|
Lord of the Rings by far. Actually had a good amount of drama (Which I can tell the two people above me don't like) while mixing action and a large world. And not to bad acting too.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 4, '09 at 9:16pm
Pois0nArr0w
1,314 posts
|
It's not even funny how much LotR beats out Harry Potter. LotR is one of the best fantasy series evar. Harry Potter... well, frankly, it sucks.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 4, '09 at 9:45pm
Bronze
1,540 posts
|
Lord of the Rings by far...well really for me all of the books about Middle-Earth. All of the back stories and history, it can make your brain swell. I won't say Harry Potter sucks, they are an easy read, but they aren't really on the same level.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 4, '09 at 9:48pm
mellowman
158 posts
|
i like harry potter............
im not saying that LOTR is dumb,but LOTR is hard to follow
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 4, '09 at 9:55pm
thisisnotanalt
6,155 posts
|
LOtR, no competition.
Tolkien is/was a literary genius, whilst Rowling. . .is not. HP is okay, but LOtR is a masterpiece. And I'm judging it on the books - the LOtR books kick HP's a** around the world and back.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 4, '09 at 10:26pm
justgotpwned
1,161 posts
|
Well i like harry potter but LotR is just so much more action.
|
| |