this is just a basic monarchy strategy that you elaborated on. what government are you? Based on this im assuming ur monarchy. So what is the point of banks? You could start of with a bank then go directly for the ops bulding. U could still earn inluence and make more ops as you go. Missiles wont be effective with this strat mostly because you wont have enough resources. Also if u wait for "bad guys" to come towards more likely you will die without your partner making some hovers or whatnot. It is much better to end the game as early as possible to cause the enemy to waste resources, snag possibly a win, and prevent a stall tactic. Most likely they will counter those ops by going strat for hover tanks and mk2s. As many know monarchy ops isnt so good as the hover/mk2/phantom combo or dual monarchy rush.

That's a horrible build. Most build would crush it since they would have hovers or a bq out before you could get enough to stop them

I thing i would like to ask people. 1v1 battles usually show how good a player is. So a good 2v2 battle shows good teamwork. Which type should people value more. Also for clans and other stuff which is more important to test, 1v1s or 2v2s? I mean u could have like 10 good 1v1ers who have no teamwork. Any opnions?

I think that 1v1 shows a single persons skill the best as you have to cover air and ground and work out your own counters without relying on a teammate. 2v2 does, as you rightly said, show how good at synchronizing builds you are and how well you can work in a team, but I do think that 1v1 shows how good a player really is.

Generally in clans, you would need people to be good at both, not just one or t'other because you don't want someone only good at 2v2 being challenged to a 1v1 and getting owned and making your clan look bad.:P

40P2P I know I have said this numerous times in the General Colony Discussion, but I have changed my mind about it.

1v1, can show which play is better, or who is the better Foxer.
2v1 shows how well you do on your own.
2v2 shows which team is under the better leader.

In my opinion
1v1 is how efficient your units and your build are
the tdh build uses all 4 resources and has the units to counter ground air and missiles

2v1 is how good you are at pinning
If your opponents are able to build up they quickly will get way more units than you and just overpower you
2v2 is how good one person is at doing antiair and the other at doing ground units

Fascists are my favorite

The tdh build shows how post is favored to win/

well post wouldnt be winning if it wrent for oops after all. The rest is easy

It's just poor game design.  That's all it is.