I do, Multiplayer Games.

Colony, Battle Sector, Shell Shock Live, Platform Racing 2

These games can be used for clan wars.

Yes, but we've already discussed having a tournament scenario. I can't see any situation where multiple groups would need to ally against one or more other groups. All we'd suggest as the administration is that the groups merge and become one group...

But then again, that assumes we're going to build a tournament model for groups, which isn't likely to happen within the AG3 software. It'll have to be something that the users manage on their own.

It'd also be cool if there was a ranking system for clans and groups for different games. For example on colony (sorry not sure how too many other multiplayer games on AG work) a ranking for matches won, matches won against other clans, maybe win ratio for clans, amount of clan memebers.

Yes, we've already talked about having group-vs-group leaderboards, but we need to investigate whether that's even something we want to build or if it's something the users of each group would manage on their own.

I say clans is a bad idea. Armorgames is a site for games. I think that the Comunity talks is good enough.

I say clans is a good idea. I reckon that whilst playing games against other clans you will be able to chat and talk and get to know your clan better and some of what they do in real life.

If clans have no function, they're not that good. However, I would say yes to clans that have actual AG functions and powers.

This is a great idea. I think you shuld only be able to join one clan. I also think that the people who are moderators and admins and such should each have a clan. There should be no more clans then that. When you join the site you should be able to choose which clan you would like to be on. Then you should recieve a clan password which will grant you access to the clan website. Inside the clan you should be able to earn clan points which are like armor points but smaller. You can choose to have a different armatar or keep yours in a clan. The owner and the leaders can schedule meetings when all the people who are part of the clan can go to the clan site and go to a chat room in which you can earn clan points by winning games there. There should also be disscussions during the meeting. This will not be required but should be required. The leaders should choose when to premote someone to deputy(only the owner can make someone a leader). The people who can become a deputy will be voted on during a clan meeting. They should be regular in clan meetings, have a good posting record, and have 51% of the clan leaders votes. The rankings could be like this:

Owner- this the admin or such that the clan belongs to.
-Can ban
-Invite
-Coment
-Schedule
-etc.

Leaders: These people are chosen by the owner of the clan and can do the same as owners exceptthey are more like the people who make sure everything is going smooth.

Deputies: They are like the advisors to the leaders and they send out all the emails of schedules and what not.
-Ban users
-Invite and coment.

Members: the basic people. They can post coments only.

The punishments for breaking any of the rules of the clan(the rules will be decided by the owner within reason). Level one rule is minor while level three is a major rule.
-first offense for a level one rule -5 points.
-second offense of a level one rule -20 points.
-third offense of a level one rule banishment for a week.
Etc.
-first offense for a level two rule -50 points.
-second offense for a level two rule banishment for a week.
-third offense for a level two rule banishment for a month.
Etc.
-first offense for a level three rule -100 points and a month banishment.
-second offense for a level two rule banishment.

If you have been banned from a clan you may join another clan after one month. If you are kicked out again then you will be clanless.
Just some thoughts.
Comcat1 :)

Sorry for the last punishment imeant level three rule not two.

I do like the idea of a clan, but I have some things to say about Comcat1's post:

I think you shuld only be able to join one clan.

I do not think this is a good idea because that would encourage alts, which I don't think the admins want.

Inside the clan you should be able to earn clan points which are like armor points but smaller.

I also think this idea is off the preferred path the admins are taking. I think clans should be part of AG rather than have separate stuff.

Owner- this the admin or such that the clan belongs to.
-Can ban
-Invite
-Coment
-Schedule
-etc.

Leaders: These people are chosen by the owner of the clan and can do the same as owners exceptthey are more like the people who make sure everything is going smooth.

Deputies: They are like the advisors to the leaders and they send out all the emails of schedules and what not.
-Ban users
-Invite and coment.

Members: the basic people. They can post coments only.

From what I see, deputies and leaders do about the same stuff, so those should be merged.

The punishments for breaking any of the rules of the clan(the rules will be decided by the owner within reason). Level one rule is minor while level three is a major rule.
-first offense for a level one rule -5 points.
-second offense of a level one rule -20 points.
-third offense of a level one rule banishment for a week.
Etc.
-first offense for a level two rule -50 points.
-second offense for a level two rule banishment for a week.
-third offense for a level two rule banishment for a month.
Etc.
-first offense for a level three rule -100 points and a month banishment.
-second offense for a level two rule banishment.

I have already called separate points a bad idea, and I don't think the punishments will be appropriate for the new AP system.

Based on what I've said, Comcat1 proposed something way off the preferred path.