There's more evolution for Spartacus living than there is of Jesus.

Just sayin.

Sorry for the double post...

Okay. I'll find the source.

Okay, found it. It was in the book "Life of Fred - Advanced Algebra". It was by Stanley F. Schmidt, who has a Ph.D.

... Fifty foot high persons would have real problems with their heart and blood vessels. If they were ten times as tall, they would have one thousand times as much volume. They would have one thousand times as much blood to be pumped. Being ten times as tall would give the blood vessels that could carry only one hundred times as much blood as a person of normal size. Either Rita's blood pressure would have to zoom upward (causing death by stroke?) or her hands, feet and brain would immediately start to go numb. She would lose consciousness in a matter of seconds.

It goes into more detail, but I think it already states the main idea. Well that was an exciting rabbit trail.

Okay, found it. It was in the book "Life of Fred - Advanced Algebra". It was by Stanley F. Schmidt, who has a Ph.D.

From what I can find that person has a bachelors and two Ph.D.s in electrical engineering.  Not exactly helpful when discussing biology.  And what do giants have to do with anything anyways?

Just mircoevolution.  Marcoevolution is a theory.

macroevolution is just a scale of evolution, it's not a separate theory. Also you use theory incorrectly as you imply it as meaning something lesser when in fact a theory is the highest thing you can have in science.

Anyway
Macroevolution Its Definition, Philosophy and History
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution The Scientific Case for Common Descent
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution Phylogenetics Primer
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution Part 1:The Unique Universal Phylogenetic Tree
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution Part 2:Past History
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution Part 3:Opportunism and Evolutionary Constraint
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution Part 4:The Molecular Sequence Evidence
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution Part 5:Change and Mutability
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution Closing remarks

There may be a number of gaps in the fossil records but that doesn't mean that we don't have a large number of transitional fossils anyway.

Even if we had no fossils we still have sufficient evidence for evolution with the DNA evidence alone.

I only read the math section if anyone cares, feel free to read the others though, I encourage you!

I find it funny you scoff at wiki then provide such unsupported material. It's a shame you still refuse to learn.

Not exactly helpful when discussing biology.  And what do giants have to do with anything anyways?

1. It's math. A=kh^2 and V=kh^3.
2. Microevolution is not small Macroevolution.

Dang it, submit button.

Even if we had no fossils we still have sufficient evidence for evolution with the DNA evidence alone.

In what ways? 'Cause DNA couldn't have existed before life did.

Wow, solid, Cowmaster. It's soo long!

It would be much better for him if you didn't encourage his ignorance.

Today, the theory of evolution is an accepted fact for everyone but a fundamentalist minority, whose objections are based not on reasoning but on doctrinaire adherence to religious principles.
-- James Watson, _Molecular Biology of the Gene_, 4th edition by James D. Watson, Nancy H. Hopkins, Jeffrey W. Roberts, Joan Argetsinger Steitz, and Alan M. Weiner; Volume I, page 3, on the first page of Chapter 1: "The Mendelian View of the World.

I think that makes a good start for my post...

1. It's math. A=kh^2 and V=kh^3.

Are you practicing irrelevance again?

2. Microevolution is not small Macroevolution.

Do you even understand what evolution is?

In what ways? 'Cause DNA couldn't have existed before life did.

You even replied to this.

"Evolution makes no such claims of how life began."

So it doesn't deal with things before life began.

It would be much better for him if you didn't encourage his ignorance.

Throwing shots are we? Name calling is not nice!  As usual this is becoming a name throwing contest rather than a debate.

find it funny you scoff at wiki then provide such unsupported material. It's a shame you still refuse to learn.

????  I refuse to learn? This kinda came outta no where.  Is wikipedia now a supported source?