Osama was a saint compared to Hitler and Stalin. Between the others, Hitler killed 12 million in the Holocaust and started a war that killed 40 million. Stalin killed 20 million of his own people, but also took out Hitler. Hitler takes the cake for Mr. Evil.
I'd say Hitler, because at least Stalin helped us out near the end, even if it was to help his own means. I agree with Listman, too, that Osama does not compare to either of them.
In my book, it goes, Hitler, Stalin, and about 5-10 more then Osama. Osama may have planned a serious blow against the US but he doesn't compare to the rest.
It's got to be Hitler simply because of how many people he killed. Also, my aunt's dad was thrown in a concentration camp. He wrote a book on it, but I don't think it's been released to the public.
Lets see. Hitler, who lead an army who killed millions of people for useless reasons, mainly Jews. Stalin, who starved millions of loyal Soviet citizens of his own country. Or Osoma, who ran a plane in a building killing relatively few people?
I'd say Hitler, because at least Stalin helped us out near the end, even if it was to help his own means.
Yea, it's because of him that the USSR got all messed up.
Stanlin killed more of his people then Hitler did, but Hitler started a war that had more casualties then what Stanlin did, so idk...
Why is Osama in this? Sounds kind of ignorant to try to compare him with these choices.
Btw, Mao killed more then Hitler (even with the war) and Stalin, so he would be the worst out of all. Kind of weird why some people in China actually praise him.
Osama is not even minisculey close to being near the same level of Hitler or Stalin. Hitler caused the genocide of millions of people and plunged the world into a war that devestated Europe's infrastructure. Oh, and he also brainwashed a country. Stalin was horrible too, but kudos to him for helping us win WWII. Without him, we probably would have had many more casualties.
Well. Osama. Yeah he attacked us, but he wasn't the entire face terrorism. Stalin. Killing his own people and justifying it through means of diplomacy among other variations of things that are so obviously messed up but still blindly accepted. Hitler. 'nuff said.
People sort of worshipped Mao like a god. He had his own little bible-type book too. :/ I don't quite remember why though. Somethjng to do with proletariats and communism.
I think this could turn into an interesting debate about dictators, actually. Their methods of propaganda, securing their people's trust, rising to power....
Really? Has the OP even opened a history textbook? There is no comparison. Personally I say Stalin is the worst between him and Hitler. Osama Bin Laden doesn't even register on the WTF Scale.
Stalin forced his country into an industrialization within the span of 20 years. Killed nearly 14 million of his own citizens and set the stage for the Cold War.
Hitler was bad, I agree. However Stalin just seemed more ruthless. Hitler had reasoning behind what he did. It was sick and twisted, but it was reasoning. Stalin just wanted power.
