|
Posted Aug 4, '11 at 2:00pm

cormyn
2,865 posts
|
This is getting off-topic, so this is the last I'll say on the matter: When Dan contacts someone who submits a game, Dan will talk to them about licensing/contracts/etc., and it's up to the game developer to ask for a fee at that point or to talk about microtransactions, etc.. Then it's up to Dan whether the game is worth the money to be on our site, etc..
Any further questions about this can go directly to Dan.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 5, '11 at 10:27pm

kingofwar1234
447 posts
|
like a few preivious users have said,(but this might be a little bit different).
there should be different ranks besides serf,squire,knight,duke,prince,king.
i know that this will probably not be put into consideration but, a user should pick a different rank thingy...i dont know how to explain it....
EX. soldier, marine, sargent, luitenate, captain, general etc....
tell me what you think about it
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 6, '11 at 9:03am

corruptedsword
1 post
|
I realy never understood the ranks, but i thought they had something to do with games you made. I like that idea, but i'd prefer it to be based on ingame scores and achiements.
Possibly you could have a designer score, and a gamer score.
Don't mean to over complicate it (which is, of course, my specialty) but you could have scores for each genra of game under a specifics tab in ranks, show the total normaly, and that way if you log on you can say "OH!(are you having cake?) i have 10 points!" then click specifics and see that 5 are rpg, 1 is designer, 3 are puzzle, and 1 is strategy!
Sorry about my ADHD rant, but I hope that was helpful!!!
"PASTA LA VISTA BEBE!!!"
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 7, '11 at 12:21pm

cormyn
2,865 posts
|
like a few preivious users have said,(but this might be a little bit different).
there should be different ranks besides serf,squire,knight,duke,prince,king.
That's not different at all.
EX. soldier, marine, sargent, luitenate, captain, general etc....
Thanks, but Dan wants to stick with the medieval / castle theme on AG3.
i'd prefer it to be based on ingame scores and achiements.
Ranks ARE based on points. And points come from Achievements.
Possibly you could have a designer score
Yeah, we've already talked about how else to reward game developers.
you could have scores for each genra of game under a specifics tab in ranks
That would be too complicated.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 10, '11 at 2:16pm

ianhq
134 posts
|
dont reset our points! It takes long enough to get them to where they are dont make me work for it again!
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 10, '11 at 2:37pm

thaboss
875 posts
|
Too late. And anyway, you won't have to work for them again because of the simple fact that there won't BE any AP (as we know it now) in AG3. There will be reputation points and the NEW AP (AG Score) which is kind of the same thing, but not really. So there.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 10, '11 at 8:32pm

cormyn
2,865 posts
|
dont make me work for it again!
Uh, you only have like 400 points. Imagine how firetail_madness feels ;o)
there won't BE any AP (as we know it now) in AG3. There will be reputation points and the NEW AP (AG Score) which is kind of the same thing, but not really. So there.
holy misinformation, batman!
We most certainly WILL have Armor Points in AG3, it's just that you'll gain them from playing games and winning Achievements instead of for community involvement.
So there.
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 11, '11 at 8:03am

thaboss
875 posts
|
B-but, that's what I kind of said, right?
the NEW AP (AG Score) which is kind of the same thing, but not really.
*bows down to almighty power of administrator*
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 11, '11 at 3:38pm

visitlegend
401 posts
|
How do u get a AG2 acc?
-Legend
|
| |
|
Posted Aug 11, '11 at 5:10pm

cormyn
2,865 posts
|
How do u get a AG2 acc?
You already have one. This web site is what we call "AG2"
that's what I kind of said, right?
Nope.
You said there "won't BE any AP in AG3" which is wrong, we will most certainly have points on AG3.
You said "reputation points" which we're not tracking as points.
You said that "reputation points" and the "NEW AP" are "kind of the same thing, but not really" which is ambiguous and wrong.
|
| |