hi everyone, my name is pickpocket and i will be your host for the Armor Gamer Championship events. We will see a lot of excitement in this game. Here are the rules...
10 people can sign up at one time. all others must wait till the season ends to join. what will happen in this game is i will say a random game on AG. Once you know what the game is, you must go and play this game. once you play it, either take a screen shot, or simply post your high score on the leader boards. YOU CAN ONLY USE THE SCORE THAT YOU GOT THAT TIME. YOU CANNOT USE OTHER SCORES. you may replay the game and post higher scores. this will eliminate your lower score. keep replaying until you get the best score possible by the end of the week.
once 10 people are ready to play, the game will be announced. all players must go and play this game, or be disculalfied from the Championship. in the starting round, the people with the 4 LOWEST high scores are eliminated from the game. the remaning 6 will go onto the next weeks game. for the 2nd round, the 3 players with the worst scores are eliminated. this leaves 3 players on the third round. for this round, you must get the highest score of the three. the person with the highest score in the 3rd round wins the Championship! the winner is not alowed to play in the next season, but is alowed to give game recomendations to me for everyone to play. the winner can not play two season back to back, but can play after sitting out one round.
If needed..I can try again and give the whole screen. In my defense..I've always been prone to just getting the essential data and cutting out the fluff
The Kongregate rules, for posting a score, are more strict. Especially when compared to the AG Championship.
We're not used to seeing a screenshot, where only the score is provided.
No background gamer over screen or anything. Just the score for the game.
I have no qualms with replaying the game..but I'm not the only one to provide just the score. In fact, one of the Kong members did the same.
I'm fine with the suspicions..I get it. Y'all are used to seeing more of the screen. I just don't like having all the distress towards me alone for it, seems a little unfair.
I wasn't suspicious of you, I just thought the rules were a bit lax, I mean, what next? No screenshot at all, we all just say what score we got? And yeah I know you weren't the only one.
Hey, I didn't see any restrictions about that, and I would prefer to not play that game again, I think screenshot was valid, though if there's any problem with that, I might fix it.
I wasn't suspicious of you, I just thought the rules were a bit lax, I mean, what next? No screenshot at all, we all just say what score we got? And yeah I know you weren't the only one.
It's happened before. I know of several instances, where scores were accepted at face value.
No screen shot or anything, you just had to say what your score was and that was it.
1Best- 203,420 if "dodgy" screen shots are allowed. otherwise, 0 2shawner-172,189 3pang-171,207 if "dodgy" screen shots are allowed. otherwise, 151,530 4josh-154,531 5Ben-153,971 6Blizard-121,749 7prec-117,685 8lou-102,927 9awein-84,228 X 10soccer-36,713 if "dodgy" screen shots are allowed. otherwise, 0 X 11EMP-0 X 11Exiled-0 X 11killersup-0 X
Without validation of partial screen shots, BestMte is out, and awein stays in.
