Forums

ForumsVideo Games

Battlefield 3

Posted Oct 28, '12 at 1:08pm

GhostOfMatrix

GhostOfMatrix

11,687 posts

Knight

The developers should've made the pistols more diverse. The three semi-autos with large mags do the same damage and have around the same number of rounds. I believe the M9 has 16 and the MP42 and G17 have 18, so there's no reason to use the M9.

 

Posted Oct 28, '12 at 1:20pm

abrazilanposer

abrazilanposer

10 posts

Hated this game

 

Posted Oct 28, '12 at 1:35pm

vinster132

vinster132

5,487 posts

Hated this game

Care to tell us why you did?

 

Posted Oct 28, '12 at 1:42pm

zonic98

zonic98

485 posts

Hated this game

I assume you're a CoD player?

 

Posted Oct 28, '12 at 3:54pm

BRAAINZz

BRAAINZz

600 posts

I assume you're a CoD player?

That reminds me, there are an exceedingly large amount of CoD players on Battlefield 3 as of late. The game costs roughly thirty dollars now and it comes with premium. Little kiddies are buying it and camping in corners with shotguns until Black Ops 2 comes out. It started the day MoH: Warfighter came out and we have to wait over twenty days for it to end.

 

Posted Oct 28, '12 at 4:25pm

GhostOfMatrix

GhostOfMatrix

11,687 posts

Knight

That reminds me, there are an exceedingly large amount of CoD players on Battlefield 3 as of late.

You can usually tell they're CoD players if they don't work as a team; not arming/disarming m-coms, not capturing/defending flags, not reviving (looking at you, Vinny), not throwing down health/ammo boxes. I hate being put on teams with those type of players.

 

Posted Oct 28, '12 at 4:28pm

ImTheMostManlyMan

ImTheMostManlyMan

2,812 posts

well i have officially come to the conclusion that if you put enough time and torture into it, the famas can be pretty awesome. with a suppressed famas with a grip and RDS site i got 3 kills with one mag while at least one of them was shooting at me and i got my hundredth kill with the famas and P90 yesterday. all is well with my realm of BF3

 

Posted Oct 28, '12 at 8:30pm

chives1

chives1

28 posts

You can usually tell they're CoD players if they don't work as a team

While that is sadly true in many cases, I believe that some people who don't play the objective directly still camp and kill the people who are going to go towards the objective a few seconds later, and no special recognition separates those campers from the K/D ratio-obsessed campers.

But, for all the work put into camping those same people could actually contribute and be rewarded triply for playing the objective, while still keeping a decent ratio. I play CoD and I've seen many a person who gets MVP for playing the objective, myself most of the time. And I still maintain a 1.50 K/D ratio after 40,000 + kills and 3,500 defends and captures apiece. Let that be a message to the noobs out there.

I hate being put on teams with those type of players.

However, if the campers didn't contribute at all to the team then in theory you would have the same or better results if the players were not there. But that does not work, as you get owned when you are 1 vs 6 on CoD. So therefore, campers must contribute to the team in some way, shape or form. The campers on the team draw out enemies to try their luck at killing them for nothing but revenge, and therefore detract from the enemies you have to deal with. So campers are a necessary, annoying, but necessary part of the FPS gaming society should we want to continue to be able to not have to deal with 6 people at the objective the whole time.

In Battlefield, the game is much more geared towards objectives. Campers can contribute a ton more in Battlefield than in CoD if they simply put down a spawn beacon or an ammo box, but I'm not asking the 4 snipers on our team to stop covering us by killing enemies from afar to come and try to arm the M-COM with their G18's. The objective players can play their part, so long as the snipers and Dark Corner McDoogles play their part as well to the best of their class's ability.

 

Posted Oct 28, '12 at 11:03pm

vinster132

vinster132

5,487 posts

You can usually tell they're CoD players if they don't work as a team; not arming/disarming m-coms, not capturing/defending flags, not reviving (looking at you, Vinny), not throwing down health/ammo boxes. I hate being put on teams with those type of players.

I can't always revive you. But at least I do other stuff.

 

Posted Oct 29, '12 at 4:42am

ImperialSheep

ImperialSheep

2 posts

I quite enjoy Battlefield 3, but on PS3 it is very underwhelming when the player per map count is capped at 24. Some maps feel rather barren at that level. I'd rather be playing on PC, but I have to wait until the end of the year until I have a decent enough rig to play the game on.

 
Reply to Battlefield 3

You must be logged in to post a reply!