Forums

ForumsWorld Events, Politics, Religion, Etc.

Is homosexuality right or wrong?

Posted Mar 18, '12 at 2:56pm

xAyjAy

xAyjAy

1,683 posts

    think homosexuality is totally wrong and unnatural,

Why?

    I agree. It isn't good at all.

Why?

What possible reason could you have for saying it is wrong?

so, if you say it is wrong you could say it is wrong for others to decide what they like by themself. if a man or a woman wants to be homosexual, why not? it would be against the human rights if you would not allow them to be homosexual.

 

Posted Mar 18, '12 at 2:59pm

Highfire

Highfire

2,936 posts

Oh, and it's difference. Even monkeys know how to spell that.

Okay, sorry but this made me laugh, seeing you say that when previously in that post you said:

that's where most people get they're "sources" these days, sadly.

Their*
xD

As for the main post. It's not a moral issue -- it's more or less scientifically viewed as natural. Where does the morality come in that? The harm caused from Homosexuality can only be one where it is 'abused' (such as cheating on someone), and not directly related to being a homosexual in itself.

I think homosexuality is totally wrong and unnatural, what do you think?

I think you could try and pass your opinion on something when you've researched it, or at least provide your current reasonings and give us the idea that you actually don't have an idea.

Homosexuality, with the support of fellow comrades, has been shown as natural in other species and is not a choice. You may believe we were given free will and that animals are brainless organisms without a conscience but you sir have been shown wrong, quite easily. They've shown emotion, recognition and even a kindness that exceeds most human's. Is this not emotion?

Never underestimate a different species' life in order to support what would be 'common' human behaviour.

- H

 

Posted Mar 18, '12 at 3:21pm

xAyjAy

xAyjAy

1,683 posts

there are many other videos that show that animals have emotions and are not just rude anymals who just eat other animals like this one.

 

Posted Mar 18, '12 at 3:50pm

Highfire

Highfire

2,936 posts

Indeed, I watched that one only earlier as I looked at the other four links I provided. Very interesting.

I think the point is proven -- animals are not empty or "below us" in a lot of ways. Sure, we've the upper hand in intelligence and technology (both of which are closely related in this case) but I don't think that strips anything from them to a moral level. Aside from, of course, knowing the situation, as many arguments against homosexuality are directed to the idea that it is "unnatural" (or that at least fuels it), whereas it's shown to be otherwise.

- H

 

Posted Mar 18, '12 at 5:01pm

toemas

toemas

315 posts

http://memegenerator.net/instance/16547808

LOOK AT THE FRICKIN HUMAN ANTOMY!!!!

 

Posted Mar 18, '12 at 5:13pm

master565

master565

3,874 posts

LOOK AT THE FRICKIN HUMAN ANTOMY!!!!

Look at what people post.

 

Posted Mar 18, '12 at 5:13pm

NoNameC68

NoNameC68

5,071 posts

Knight

Why are we talking about animals and whether homosexuality is natural?

Whether homosexuality is natural or not shouldn't really matter. Animals don't play video games. Are video games wrong? Most animals don't use other objects as tools, are tools wrong? Animals don't have a crap load of sex positions, does that make anything other than missionary or doggy style wrong?

Whether homosexuality is natural or not should NOT play a part in determining if homosexuality is wrong or not.

Let's say that homosexuality isn't natural. Let's say that homosexuality is picked up through experimentation, media, and social norms. Let's say that everyone is born straight. Would all of this make homosexuality wrong? Hell no! Whether homosexuality is a choice or not is NOT important in determining whether homosexuality should be acceptable.

 

Posted Mar 18, '12 at 5:19pm

HahiHa

HahiHa

5,027 posts

Knight

LOOK AT THE FRICKIN HUMAN ANTOMY!!!!

Did you know that the only difference between the vaginal and pharyngial mucous membrane is one little muscle layer?
Also, the prostata is in the vicinity of the rectum, and prostata massages are said to be quite relaxing.
Honestly, for many sexual practics I don't see real anatomical problems.

C'mon, being homosexual means that you are attracted to/fall in love with same-sex people, and you can't help it! They are attracted to the same gender the exact same way you are attracted to the opposite gender.

Now I ask you: would you be able to ignore your hormones and enter a relationship with a guy, only because it's social norm? No? So why would you ask a homosexual guy to enter a relationship with a girl? Because I don't know if you realize it, but it's not all only about the sex.

About the anatomy again, the vagina is of course adapted to reproduction which is not the case of the rectum, but most of the time it isn't used that way, rather it's used for pleasure. So why shouldn't homosexuals be able to use other body orifices for pleasure? It's basically the same thing.

 

Posted Mar 18, '12 at 5:21pm

Zamiel

Zamiel

142 posts

I don't see why homosexuality should be considerd wrong or right.
A same-sex relation ,in my opinion, can be compared to any other intersex relation.
You search for certain values and traits in people , some people just find them in people from the same sex , what makes this wrong ?
You can go on and on about how it's unnatural but let me ask you this , everyone has there own preferences so if a guy falls in love with a rather plumpy woman who most other people don't see as a pretty or attractive , well does that make their love unnatural ?
And for the human anatomy part , just go stroll arround on the internet and you'll find plenty of other things that are not meant to be considering our anatomy.

 

Posted Mar 18, '12 at 9:31pm

MageGrayWolf

MageGrayWolf

9,676 posts

Knight

Humans are animals. It's just our brains are more evolved than those of other animals. Oh, and it's difference. Even monkeys know how to spell that.

Well our brains aren't more evolved, just differently evolved and overly developed. Just like how certain jelly fish have poison that is so overly developed that even a small sting to a large animal can be fatal.

Why are we talking about animals and whether homosexuality is natural?

To counter the argument that it's not natural. Though I do agree it being natural holds no baring to the right or wrong of it.

Animals don't play video games.

Sure they do. If this is the same chimp I've seen before, the chimp can beat most human players.

Chimp Playes Pac-Man

Now I ask you: would you be able to ignore your hormones and enter a relationship with a guy, only because it's social norm? No? So why would you ask a homosexual guy to enter a relationship with a girl? Because I don't know if you realize it, but it's not all only about the sex.

If sexuality really was a choice I would choose to be bi. I see no reason to limit my sexual enjoyment to one gender.

What often is forgotten is that things aren't right or wrong, moral or immoral by way of virtue.

 
Reply to Is homosexuality right or wrong?

You must be logged in to post a reply!