I have now updated the game. you are able to post again.

-Blade

hey hey hey

Are you still here?

no problem babe

"You couldn't have possibly typed that with a straight face. My point is that God made it pretty obvious that he exists. Just go to google images and type in: "hubble telescope pictures" or something. And be honest, did you watch the whole video?"

I did, and the fact that you said "with a straight face" proves that the video is emotional rhetoric. thanks.

"Alrighty. Where do you get your morals?"

we get our morals from the laws of the land, mixed with a bit of personal interpretation. that's how religion got their morals too, they just never admitted it.

"So are you saying that in order for something to be logically deduced, then the items involved have to exist?"

no, they just need to be able to be proven with credible observation, not twisted logic. credible observation isn't the bible, or that special feeling you get when you think something is related to god.

"Alright. It has been proven that DNA is not made of spaghetti. Therefore, there is no such thing as pastaism. However, it has not been proven that God exists. Therefore, it can not be proven that there is no such thing as perfection."

beside the point, you said make up a concept, and I did. doesn't matter what science says, I say my DNP exists (sound familliar?)

that argument of yours fails because there is a bunch of scientific evidence disproving god, but your indoctrination easily prevents you from acknowledging it.

"Are you saying that if you aren't aware of something, then it doesn't exist? So just because at one point and time, people didn't know about Bryozoa, that means that they didn't exist?"

so what? we then found evidence they existed, and then they are now scientific fact. find scientific evidence that god exists, and then he will be scientific fact.

"So you're just one-sided. You have only one mindset and that is 100% debate mode. I feel bad that you don't think outside the box."

I consider it more along the lines of focused. in fact, I'm a rather dynamic character, but when there is a serious topic, I expect serious adherence to the topic. kind of the same way a teacher who is grading a students essay expects the student to adhere to the topic of the essay. you consider it robotic, I consider it necessary for a debate.

"You are being most very black and white. You see two alternatives. You see positive reinforcement and then you see furious, abusive and destructive violence. And like I said, there is a balance."

actually, I was basing that little piece off of your many posts from that wonderful little thread you made known as "has the world gotten wimpy?" (or along those lines)

-Blade