mysteriousmexican666 
- Member since: 3/12/2011
- AIM: for yo momma (or mama, mamma etc.)
- MSN: [insert smart aleck comment here]
- Yahoo: It's actually 'yodelayihoo'
- XBOX Live: Getting drunk isn't necessarily a good aspect of a red neck
- Wii: Wharf diving is a normal part of an orthodontist's diet
- PS3: Blu-ray baby!
- SteamID: Confucius say: Wife not part of furniture, until screwed on bed.
About
Heh heh, my name is too long!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TOBUSCUS!!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
6 Secret Truths in Life:
1. You cannot touch all your teeth with your tongue.
2. All idiots, after reading the first truth, will try it.
3. And discover that the first truth is a lie.
4. You're smiling now because you're an idiot.
5. You soon will forward this to another idiot.
6. There's still a stupid smile on your face.
Pass it on if you're an idiot who fell for it!(I did)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My favorite quotes:
It's either you, or me. And the way I see it, it might as well be you! ~~~ John Marston
War, war never changes... ~~~ Narrator from Fallout series
You know, if there is one thing I have learned, it's that we must obey the rules of the game. We can pick the game, Niko Bellic, but we cannot change the rules.~~~ Dimitri Rascolov, GTA IV
Just be yourself! Everyone else is taken. ~~~ Steve Kardynal, Youtube
Everybody seems to think I'm lazy. I don't mind, I think they're crazy. ~~~ "I'm Only Sleeping", The Beatles
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A funny song!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A classic joke: Doctor: Hello
Patient: Hi
Doctor: Looks like your healthy
Patient: So is your mom
Doctor: I know
Patient: Alrighty then
Doctor: Coolio
Patient: I'll be leaving then
Doctor: Okay
(That wasn't actually supposed to be funny)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hello! I'm just a regular Mexican, but I'm not stereotypical (Although, I do sleep a lot). Say anything about my race and you might want to start sleeping with a nerf gun under your pillow because I will send a posse of Russians after you (fully equipped with a twin turbine hydrocarbonated rubber knife infused onto a snuggy). Alright, maybe I won't, but you have to admit, you probably weren't scared!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Playstation 3 Platinums:
GTA IV (100%)
Mafia 2 (73%)
Fallout 3 (100%)
Fallout: New Vegas (100%)
Red dead Redemption (96%)
Infamous (100%)
L.A. Noire (100%)
Working On:
Borderlands
2351
Armor Points
- 254 games rated
- 778 comments
- 287 forum posts
- 0 games submitted
- 0 merits


View all comments »Bladerunner679 says:
Posted at 4:49pm on 5/7/2012
back, and I'm going to finish my rebuttal.
another thing I noticed in this article is that they seem to be making up much of their information. when I say this, it doesn't necessarily mean that they are pulling it out of their ***, but more like they aren't sourcing some of their big claims. they are making article references, but not enough to actually convince me of any real research. also, some of the stuff they are using as references are religiously biased (doesn't mean the article is, but it might mean they are using the confirmation principle, or "indoctrination").
this is where I am going to stop for now. now it's time for your rebuttal.
-Blade
Jefferysinspiration says:
Posted at 8:08pm on 5/6/2012
Some people are morons when it comes to stereotyping homosexuals.
Bladerunner679 says:
Posted at 4:12pm on 5/5/2012
...you're no fun. here I was trying to lighten th mood, because chances are, this debate will sway neither of us in any way.
I'm going to start with the website first, and then go into the article:
1. the website clearly states it has a religious bias, and people are sinners. this sets up the assumption that god exists, and that nothing is pure chance or coincedental. that is the first nail in the coffin.
2.this website is clearly set up as a "creation science" website. because of this, it is part bias, part pseudoscience, and then part cherrypicking of actual science. this by default sets up an argument from authority fallacy, and an argument from antiquity fallacy because it states "We believe the Bible is the inspired and authoritative word of God."
but enough about the website and it's foolishness, lets get down to the meat of the debate shall we?
it is true that these constants are there, but that doesn't mean god exists. it could simply be pure chance, or even coincidence. they are jumping to conclusions a little early, and that is a bit of a problem.
they are also calling "god" in the fact that the universe has the potential to support life. that's all well and good, but it has the potential to support life, because life had to be created with what was available, not by magical force. a better way to describe it is abiogenesis http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg
this is only part of my rebuttal. I would continue it, but I have to go to work for now. I ask that you don't reply until after I finish (I will tell you when I am).
-Blade
Bladerunner679 says:
Posted at 3:24pm on 5/5/2012
"You seem to hold yourself in high gravitas and that is your arrogance. The actual debate hasn't even started yet you've acted as you've won. Honestly, you remind me of a chained dog. You bark and bark at passerby people and you think you are doing something, but in actuality you are just sitting on your chain. Let's please start the actual debate."
lol, what a high horse you have. acting all holier than thou, and then calling me a dog. I at least acknowledged my arrogance, why can't you?
very well, since you are ready to begin, I will read the article and get back to you on it.
-Blade
Bladerunner679 says:
Posted at 4:13am on 5/5/2012
"Why do you always assume?"
you'd be surprised how little I actually assume, but it's good to see that you don't give assumptions weight, it means that I won't have to deal with them.
"You didn't take my article seriously, so by default, I can be a little offended of your trickery."
by all means, I wouldn't mind you doing that at all. you have every right to be offended, just like how I have every right to test your ignorance.
"Does that mean that I am/was going to mute out anything you would have said?"
perhaps, perhaps not, but seeing as how indoctrination is one of the main life support systems for religion these days, I wouldn't have been surprised if you did exactly what I had assumed in the first place. assumptions tend to get stronger every time someone confirms them.
"No. You seem a little arrogant, because I could turn your argument back on you... It doesn't matter how long and how much I can explain Christianity to ignorant atheists, it seems like they only pick out the so called "contradictions" that fit their argument..."
I'm "arrogant" because arrogance tends to grow when nothing that opposes you can actually withstand you. funny how it works, isn't it?
call me ignorant if you like, but I was born and raised christian, and in fact, I was quite the believer a while back, but when one learns that everything they were taught as a child was wrong, then one tends to feel a little pain, and old wounds can still reopen at any given moment in time.
as for the contradiction part: almost everyone is guilty of doing this, but most of the time, I try to do it as little as possible because I know it has a high chance of backfiring. my question to you is: how often do you attempt this, and how often do you actually get away with it?
-Blade