Armor Games

tiger25691

• Member since: 11/22/2010
• AIM: WORLD DOMINATION MUUUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

I am finally updating my profile and putting something on it that I will hope to save people. Not physically but spiritually( inspired to put this on by thecattygrl)
-------††††-------Please
-------††††-------Place
-------††††-------This
††††††††††††Cross
††††††††††††On
-------††††-------Your
-------††††-------Profile
-------††††-------To Show
-------††††-------That You
-------††††-------Believe
-------††††-------In Jesus
Read this and put on your page if your a believer. if your not already a believer just tell me and I will tell you how to become a christian. I am very strong in my faith for Jesus Christ not matter if your an atheist or Muslim you canNOT say anything that will turn me away from my faith. I do hope to make a lot of friends on Ag and to bring people to Christ our Father Amen.   

1. RainbowGoGangster3 says:

   Posted at 5:40pm on 5/26/2012

   its okay i kinda quit so im not on a lot. how have you been lately?

2. MageGrayWolf says:

   Posted at 3:37am on 5/26/2012

   "Yet it is still referred to as a theory today even science doesn't except it as a scientific law because there are to many holes in the theory."

   First off a theory doesn't become law. Also a theory does not mean it's full of holes. The definitions your provided basically state what I said. "an explanation of related observations or events based on hypotheses and verified multiple times by different independent researchers."

   "Thoery's can most of the time be proven right which in this case the evolution theory has been proven WRONG."

   We can't say that a theory is proven . It's main attribute is that it needs to remain falsifiable. Saying that it's proven would eliminate this. Falsifiable means they must be capable of being modified based on new evidence.

   Furthermore non of the supporting hypotheses (notice I said hypotheses not hypothesis, hypotheses is plural of hypothesis) have been found to be wrong. This is why evolution is a theory. if the hypotheses weren't verified ("proven" wrong) evolution wouldn't be a theory.

   "Yes it does offer an explanation for of how everything got here BUT they CAN NOT prove how the materials got there to make our universe that we see today."

   That's not what the theory of evolution covers. How the material got there in the first place is irrelevant to what we see the material doing.

   "I know what fact is and the evolution theory IS NOT fact."

   It most certainly is a fact. As I have already pointed out. The observations allow it to fit the definition of fact.

   "Micro evolution yes but macro evolution NO. Mirco evolution is one animal changing ONE feature on it is body like if its a bird its beak."

   Wrong that's not what macroevolution is. Macroevolution is changes at or above the level of species. A animal changing from one species to another would be macroevolution. We see this happen in ring species.
   But even using your false definition we still see this happening. For example, a species of Italian wall lizard developed an entirely new digestive track, along with new behavior norms.

   "Macro evolution is IMPOSSIBLE it can NOT be done in any way shape or form."

   Micro and macro evolution is the same thing, just at different scales. All those little changes below the level of species simply add up to one big change at or above the level of speices.

   But I would like to know what makes maroevolution impossible? What mechanism do you think is in place that prevents a number of small changes to add up to one big change?

3. Kasic says:

   Posted at 12:51am on 5/26/2012

   Forgot this last one...

   "Macro evolution is IMPOSSIBLE it can NOT be done in any way shape or form."

   Then what are fossils?

4. Kasic says:

   Posted at 12:41am on 5/26/2012

   "Yet it is still referred to as a theory today even science doesn't except it as a scientific law because there are to many holes in the theory."

   I know I've corrected you on this at least 5 times already.

   http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA201.html
   http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA202.html

   "Thoery's can most of the time be proven right which in this case the evolution theory has been proven WRONG."

   I'd love to see how. Please, tell me. You might even win a Nobel Prize for debunking one of the most solid theories in scientific history.

   "BUT they CAN NOT prove how the materials got there to make our universe that we see today."

   This is such a hypocritical claim.

   http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA221.html

   "I know what fact is and the evolution theory IS NOT fact."

   Sigh. Except for the overwhelming mountain of evidence which we have for it. There's a very good reason 99.9% of all scientists accept evolution as proven and true. The .1% that don't are just die hard creationists who can't rectify their brainwashed upbringing with actual fact and like to claim that methods which are used to prove it are false but then accept them without hesitation on other matters. Pure hypocrisy.

   "Micro evolution yes but macro evolution NO. Mirco evolution is one animal changing ONE feature on it is body like if its a bird its beak."

   http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB110.html
   http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB901.html

   Have fun reading how your arguments have long been debunked and are laughable.

   Unless, of course, you'd actually like to provide some evidence and not groundless chatter about your uninformed opinion? I've yet to see a creationist do so. In my experience, creationists, such as yourself, love to go on and on and on about how evolution is false but never actually say how.

5. MageGrayWolf says:

   Posted at 6:51pm on 5/12/2012

   "So just because someone typed it on the internet doesn't mean its fact. It is still referred to as a theory today due to all the flaws in it. Like I said before even SCIENCE itself has dis proven the theory over and over again."

   If science found it false it wouldn't be a theory.

   Theory; A scientific explanation of related observations or events based on hypotheses and verified multiple times by different independent researchers.

   Since evolution offers an explanation of objective verifiable observations and it has been verified many times, evolution is a theory.

   Fact; An objective, verifiable observation. They can be, and has been, verified many times.

   We have made an objective observation of evolution taking place and it has been verified many times. As a result evolution is also a fact.