I understand common sense though. Something that doesn't have proof to back it up is invalid.
So it's common sense that a super powered being created the universe that created this super powered being and you know this without anything of substance to support it?
"
Okay fair enough I can't back up my claims but I can still believe them."
Since you seem to be admitting here that your claim is unsubstantiated then it should be considered invalid.
I asked a counter-question though. Which you didn't answer.
We have been answering you while all you have done is dodge questions.
God said "Let there be Universe" or something. The Universe Appeared. Simple. It could happen again if he stated that phrase again.
Literally you're believing that some being said abracadabra and that made the universe.
"
From the creationistâs perspective, the method or mechanism of creation which these mystical beings use is nothing more than a golem spell where clay statues are animated with an enchantment. Or its an incantation in which complex modern plants and animals are "spoken" into being. Thatâs right, magic words which cause fully-developed adult animals to be conjured out of thin air. Or a god simply wishes them to exist; so they do. Thatâs it! There really is nothing more to it than that; pure freakinâ magic â"by definition." -AronRa
So I'd say "If you don't know and I don't know then my statement is True until proven False. Like the justice system innocent until proven guilty." I'd say.
You got it backwards. The claim in a justice system is that a person did it. So in a justice system something would be false until proven true. This is also so in science. i would recommend you look up something called the
null hypothesis.
I don't know what Bible you read but NEVER anywhere in the Bible does it say anything but God.
Okay i guess i will step in here. There are various terms used when speaking of God, one of them is his proper name, which in the Hebrew text is only two letter. The closest translation we have for these letters into English is Yhwh. We really have no idea how exactly this was originally pronounced, but the closest we could figure would have been Yahweh. Jehovah is another way to pronounce it as some alphabets Y and J can be interchangeable and W and V (or more accurately VV) can be interchangeable. However J and V didn't exist in this early language, this is why Y and W are the more likely characters.
As for that blue Bible site. El is a proper name of a god and a title, translating as "most high" or "God". Earlier religions has El as Yahweh's father. There is also Elohim. This is a pluralization of El, so Elohim means gods.
On a final note Allah is just the word for God, not exactly a name.
Now going back to the topic.
That's talking about something else, It's something you can actually SEE. You can not SEE that the Big Bang happened so it needs proof.
I provided you with the evidence for the Big Bang, even bothering to copy and paste it all down here because you didn't like the look of the site, which you subsequently ignored.
WE HAVE THE "PROOF" THAT WE CAN SEE!However you have no "
roof" that this God did what you claim he did or even that this God exists at all. You don't know either, yet you are claiming that you do.
That's simply because it's Common knowledge where to get stuff to make a cake. It's not common knowledge to know where to get stuff to make a universe from an EMPTY void.
What the hell does that have to do with anything?
But then where did the stuff that formed the Big Bang come from. We basically have no idea.
Yet you're claiming to know what I unknown. That is what's making your statements so intellectually dishonest.
No what I meant was you can't ask me about it in my theory if you don't even know it yourself in yours.
Yes we can since you're positing a claim to know.
