Why not both? I mean isn't it possible to have a gentle, peaceful anarchy? Must it all be slow and painful to the country? It is peace that quickly, silently, and without conflict can take over nations. So why not a peaceful anarchy? hmmm?
peace is destroyed by certain people, and peace believers argue and war with them, world peace is a whole different thing. if i can choose world peace, i would, if its just peace, then i choose neither
But, you have to admit, without Anarchy, all of the parties in the world would turn into Teatimes. I would go for peace, but, like in Star Wars, without Anarchy, the series would get boring.
I would go with peace because if it was anarchy people would be going around doing whatever they want like if i wanted to i could go to someone and just shank them (i wouldn't do that even i was aloud)