I don't quite remember who doubted miracles, but how do you explain these? Scientists have always chosen to stay away from these. Kinda funny how these people were known as holy people when alive.
Miracle are something thats physically impossible and partyDevil you are freakin sick for posting that comment
By that definition, surviving a high fall is not a miracle. Even anything incredibly improbable is not a miracle when it happens. Do you know how many "miracles" that already rules out?
And how can one be "freaking sick" for posting a song? 0.o
partyDevil you are freakin sick for posting that comment
ty, but i know that already. i just happen to have a dark sense of humor
anyway. there have been scammers using this exact thing. "a miracle cure" and have actually become rich from it. you wanna know why? because people believed what they said. people didn't really think about it. they heard it and so it must be true. whitout any further reasoning.
(see what they did wrong? now look at yourself. and plz., note that your doing the same.)
*most of what can be proven Don't want to be hypocritical about my Agnostic belief. The one case, though
If i have a hammer, and I bury it in the sand in the ocean, and you have absolutely no way of finding it, but i tell you it exists, does that mean it doesn't exist?
If i have a hammer, and I bury it in the sand in the ocean, and you have absolutely no way of finding it, but i tell you it exists, does that mean it doesn't exist?
Nope. That means, until evidence in provided on its existence, then I am ahammerist.
^Get it? It's a play on words with atheist.
Anyways..I would be without knowledge of the hammer's existence. I would have a lack in belief in the existence of the hammer..not a belief in its non-existence
Do you believe what scientist say about things you can't see?
Like a good math equation any science worth it's salt shows it's work so that others can follow and replicate it. They show how they got what they got and what lead them to what they got. In short we can follow the evidence.
Nope. That means, until evidence in provided on its existence, then I am ahammerist.
^Get it? It's a play on words with atheist.
Anyways..I would be without knowledge of the hammer's existence. I would have a lack in belief in the existence of the hammer..not a belief in its non-existence
I may have to screenshot this. You summed up the position of most atheists quite well in that analogy.
Like a good math equation any science worth it's salt shows it's work so that others can follow and replicate it. They show how they got what they got and what lead them to what they got. In short we can follow the evidence.
This just shows how untrustworthy you guys are. Sometimes, you have to believe because someone said. Of course, you need proof of some sort, but I forget how faithless you all are.
