I think that if Sega made a whole new dream cast they do well i think because they could improve the graphics so this could be good chance for them. Like make the old the new whats your opion.
well obviously sega couldnt keep up with th big companies like sony and nintendo so i think that it just doesnt have the talent to make a good game system since they didnt make it big in the past. in my opinion i dont think that if dreamcast 2 came out which it probably wont that it wouldnt be good anyways.
Yeah, this topic has been dead a while. But I'm going to make a constructive comment anyway.
I think that if Sega made a whole new dream cast they do well i think because they could improve the graphics so this could be good chance for them. Like make the old the new whats your opion.
Like, that's just completely contrary to every shred of marketing wisdom ever. Why? Because most people have entirely forgotten there was even such a thing as a 'Dreamcast'. But if you remind them, they'll remember exactly what a spectacular flop it turned out to be. Regardless of how good or not it was, the main feature of the Dreamcast was that it disappeared within maybe two months of being made available to the public. Why would Sega want to revive such embarrassment?
That's right, it wouldn't. Best to call it something else entirely, so it won't appear like flogging a dead horse. That is, as nick pointed out, if Sega might even have any success making a decent console, or whether it'd be wiser to simply spend those resources on making games.
