Not to be poking my nose where I don't belong, but I skimmed over your thread, and I have to say, I somewhat agree with pang.
As for your actual drawings (or sketches) themselves, I will admit they have potential. Needs a lot of fine tuning. Focus more on bringing 3D-perspective into them, so that way they aren't as flat and awkward.
It didn't seem that rude to me. I would take that advice in hand and go with it. I agree that it can be applied to your work. For example, your "Wulf" does indeed resemble a wolf, but, I have to say, it's not a very realistic wolf. As pang had suggested, 'fine-tuning' the wolf a bit and adding shading that looks a bit more like fur would greatly improve the subject matter.
However, your 'Deathhawk' is very clean and neat and aesthetically pleasing. I would suggest that perhaps you stick to mechanisms for now, but that's my own opinion, which you are not entitled to follow if you don't feel like it.
Not to be poking my nose where I don't belong, but I skimmed over your thread, and I have to say, I somewhat agree with pang.
As for your actual drawings (or sketches) themselves, I will admit they have potential. Needs a lot of fine tuning. Focus more on bringing 3D-perspective into them, so that way they aren't as flat and awkward.
It didn't seem that rude to me. I would take that advice in hand and go with it. I agree that it can be applied to your work. For example, your "Wulf" does indeed resemble a wolf, but, I have to say, it's not a very realistic wolf. As pang had suggested, 'fine-tuning' the wolf a bit and adding shading that looks a bit more like fur would greatly improve the subject matter.
However, your 'Deathhawk' is very clean and neat and aesthetically pleasing. I would suggest that perhaps you stick to mechanisms for now, but that's my own opinion, which you are not entitled to follow if you don't feel like it.
People are far too afraid to give criticism in the AMW now-a-days. Everyone wants to jump on the compliment train instead of telling a person what they did wrong or what to improve on (which in turn helps them grow).
I also agree with that portion of her text. Praise is all well and good, but criticism is also vital. Without criticism, you can't improve your art. For example, your beginning 'expressions'....no offence intended at all, but they don't really strike me as very good art. If I had to be completely honest, it looks like it was drawn by a six-year-old using MS Paint. I'm not calling you a six year old. I simply fail to see how it could be considered as very good art. I don't feel any great emotional upwelling from looking at it. If you feel insulted and a need to rage at me because of that, then fine. I will accept it.
I began typing this post as the second comment on the page was being posted. Since then, you've started insulting pang (which I see no reason for) and Clancy made an admittedly uncalled-for comment.
Once more, I agree with pang.
[quote]where idiots go back and forth
1) Resorting to name calling after I tried to help you? oh ok
2) Some of those people I happen to be friends with. So excuse me as I take this asinine comment to heart.[/quote]
I believe you insulting not just pang, but everyone that posts in the "You're Banned" thread is very rude. I post in that thread, and so have possible hundreds of other users who have done nothing to you. I think you've even posted in there a few times.
And if anyone's posted after your last comment, Themastaplaya, I did not see it.
Yes, I agree with you Nichodemus.
